Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K C Jnanendra vs The State Of Karnataka
2022 Latest Caselaw 7385 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7385 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2022

Karnataka High Court
K C Jnanendra vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 May, 2022
Bench: Alok Aradhe, J.M.Khazi
                               1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

          DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2022

                           PRESENT

          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

                             AND

            THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI

               W.P. NO.14109 OF 2019 (KLGP)

BETWEEN:

K.C. JNANENDRA
S/O CHINNAPPAGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/O KAREMANE
NERALAMANE VILLAGE
THENGINKOPPA POST
THIRTHAHALLI TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
                                      ... PETITIONER
(BY MR. PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADV.,)

AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
       M S BUILDING
       BENGALURU-560001
       REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.

2.     THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
       SHIVAMOGGA DIVISION
       SHIVAMOGGA-577201.

3.     THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
       SHIVAMOGGA-577201.
                                2



4.   THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
     THIRTHAHALLI SUB DIVISION
     THIRTHAHALLI
     SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577432.

5.   THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER
     THIRTHAHALLI RANGE
     THIRTHAHALLI
     SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577432.

6.   THE DEPUTY RANGE FOREST OFFICER
     THENGINAKOPPA DIVISION
     THIRTHAHALLI
     SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577432.

7.   THE TAHASILDAR
     THIRTHAHALLI TALUK
     THIRTHAHALLI
     SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577432.

                                         ... RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. S. RAJASHEKAR, AGA)
                              ---

     THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THE KARNATAKA
LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011 (KARNATAKA ACT 38 OF
2014) AS ULTRA VIRES THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BEING
VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 14, 20, 21 AND 300A. DECLARE THE
KARNATAKA    LAND    GRABBING    PROHIBITION   ACT   2011
(KARNATAKA ACT 38 OF 2014) IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FACTS
AND   CIRCUMSTANCES     OF   THE   PETITIONER   CASE   IN
NO.LGC(G)523/2018 BEFORE THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING
PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU. QUASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS LGC(G)523/2018 INITIATED BY THE R-5 WHICH IS
PENDING   BEFORE     THE   KARNATAKA     LAND   GRABBING
PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-E &
ETC.

     THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR HEARING,         THIS   DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                  3




                                 ORDER

Mr.Pruthvi Wodeyar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Sri.S.Rajashekar, learned Additional Government

Advocate for the respondents.

In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the

following reliefs:

a) Issue a writ declaring that the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 2014) as ultra vires the Constitution of India being violative of Article 14, 20, 21 and 300-A and/or in the alternative;

b) Issue a writ declaring that the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 2014) is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the petitioner case in case No.LGC (T) 1009/2018 before the Special Court, Bangalore vide Annexure A;

c) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ or order or direction in the similar nature quashing the impugned order dated 18.09.2018 vide Annexure A on the file of the Special Court, Bangalore constituted under the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 in No.LGC (T) 1009/2018.

2. When the matter was taken up today, learned

Additional Government Advocate for the respondents submits

that the validity of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition

Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), has

been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court vide order

dated 19.01.2021 passed in W.P.No.47747/2017.

3. For the reasons assigned by a Division Bench of this

Court in the aforesaid judgment, the challenge made to the

provisions of the Act in the instant petition is hereby repelled.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take all such

contentions as are permissible in law in the proceeding before

the Special Court constituted under the provisions of the Act.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, with the

aforesaid liberty.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter