Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4048 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2022
-1-
RPFC No. 200049 of 2017
C/W RPFC No. 200086 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
R.P.F.C.NO. 200049 OF 2017
C/W
R.P.F.C.NO. 200086 OF 2017
IN RPFC No.200049/2017
BETWEEN:
P.MD. RAFIQ S/O P.SHAIKSHAVALI,
AGED ABOUT: 32 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE
IN LIC OF INDIA, YEMMIGANUR,
R/O H.NO.18/690, NEAR SHARADA CONVENT SCHOOL,
NEAR TOHID MASJID, YEMMIGANUR TQ.YEMMIGANUR,
DIST.KURNOOL(A.P).
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOPALKRISHNA B YADAV,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. P. RUBEENA W/O P.MD RAFIQ ,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
R/O NEAR SHARADA CONVENT SCHOOL,
YEMMIGANUR, NOW RESIDING AT
H.NO.12-12-276/8/1, ARAB MOHALLA,
RAICHUR-585 401.
2. P.FARHANA D/O P.MD.RAFIQ,
AGED ABOUT 2 1/2 YEARS,
MINOR U/G OF NATURAL MOTHER
I.E., PETITIONER NO.1
...RESPONDENT'S
(BY SRI. SANJEEV KUMAR C PATIL.,ADVOCATE)
-2-
RPFC No. 200049 of 2017
C/W RPFC No. 200086 of 2017
THIS RPFC FILED U/S. 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT,
PRAYING TO ALLOW THE SAID REVISION PETITION BY SETTING
ASIDE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 17.02.2017 PASSED BY THE
PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAICHUR AT RAICHUR IN
CRL.MISC.NO.68/2016, AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE
PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN, IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
IN RPFC No.200086/2017
BETWEEN:
1. P. RUBEENA W/O P.MD RAFIQ ,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
R/O NEAR SHARADA CONVENT SCHOOL,
YEMMIGANUR, NOW AT RESIDING AT
H.NO.12-12-276/8/1, ARAB MOHALLA,
RAICHUR-585 401.
2. P.FARHANA D/O P.MD.RAFIQ,
AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, MINOR
U/G OF NATURAL MOTHER,
PETITIONER NO.1.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SANJEEV KUMAR C.PATIL,ADVOCATE)
AND:
P.MD. RAFIQ S/O P.SHAIKSHAVALI,
AGED ABOUT: 33 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE
IN LIC OF INDIA, YEMMIGANUR,
R/O H.NO.18/690, NEAR SHARADA CONVENT SCHOOL,
NEAR TOHID MASJID, YEMMIGANUR TQ.YEMMIGANUR,
DIST.KURNOOL(A.P)-518001.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. GOPALKRISHNA B YADAV,ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC FILED U/S. 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT,
1984, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE SAID REVISION PETITION BY
SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 17.02.2017 PASSED
BY THE PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAICHUR AT RAICHUR IN
CRL.MISC.NO.68/2016, AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE
PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN.
THESE R.P.F.C. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
-3-
RPFC No. 200049 of 2017
C/W RPFC No. 200086 of 2017
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner in RPFC
No.200049/2017 submits that petitioner is no more and
petition is abated. The said submission is placed on
record.
2. The petition in RPFC No.200049/2017 is
dismissed as abated.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in RPFC
No.200086/2017 has filed a memo stating that in view of
death of respondent petition does not survive for
consideration. Memo is placed on record.
4. Accordingly, the petition in RPFC
No.200086/2017 is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
In view of disposal of petitions, pending applications
do not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
msr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!