Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4042 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
RSA No.200428/2019
Between:
Sangappa S/o Bhimappa Myageri,
Age: 63 years, Occ: Coolie,
R/o Vandal, Tq: Basavanna-Bagewadi,
Dist: Vijaypur.
... Appellant
(By Smt. Hema L. Kulkarni &
Sri Anant P. Savadi, Advocates)
And:
1. Yallawwa D/o Bhimappa Myageri,
Age: 74 Years, Occ: Household,
R/o Vandal, Tq: Basavanna-Bagewadi,
Dist: Vijaypur.
2. Devakkawwa W/o Kallappa Hadimani,
Age: 49 years, Occ: Household,
R/o Vandal, Tq: Basavanna -Bagewadi,
Dist: Vijaypur.
3. Sumangala W/o Basappa Chalawadi,
Age: 44 Years, Occ: Household,
R/o Vandal,
Tq: Basavanna-Bagewadi,
2
Dist: Vijaypur.
4. Shushilabai D/o Bandeppa Myageri,
Age: 41 Years, Occ: Household,
R/o Vandal,
Tq: Basavanna-Bagewadi,
Dist: Vijaypur.
5. Lakkawwa W/o Bandeppa Myageri,
Age: 41 Years, Occ: Household,
R/o Vandal,
Tq: Basavanna-Bagewadi,
Dist: Vijaypur.
6. Yallawwa D/o Bhimappa Myageri,
Age: 74 Years, Occ: Household,
R/o Vandal,
Tq: Basavanna-Bagewadi,
Dist: Vijaypur.
... Respondents
This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section
100, Order 42 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of CPC,
praying to call for records from the lower Court and set
aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.98/2011,
passed by the Civil Judge (Jr., Dn.,) Basavanabagewadi
dated 27th day of September 2013 and set aside the
judgment and decree passed by Senior Civil Judge
Basavanabagewadi in R.A.No.28/2013, to meet the ends of
justice.
This appeal coming on for Orders, this day, the Court
delivered the following:-
3
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant, in the
morning session, sought for pass over of the case for
compliance of office objections. Hence, the matter
was passed over. When the matter is called in the
afternoon session, none appears for the appellant.
2. This appeal is filed on 18.12.2019. The
matter was listed before the Court on 08.02.2021.
Two weeks time was granted for compliance of office
objections. Again matter was listed on 04.10.2021.
Finally, four weeks time was granted for compliance of
office objections, failing which, the appeal was
ordered to be listed for dismissal. Matter was again
listed on 15.11.2021, on which date, one week time
was granted for compliance. Again on 21.12.2021,
when the matter was listed, one week time was
granted for compliance subject to payment of costs of
Rs.200/-.
3. Today, matter is listed for non-compliance of
office objections for the 4th time. Inspite of granting
sufficient opportunities, learned counsel for the
appellant has not complied with the office objections.
Even today there is no representation on behalf of the
appellant and it is forthcoming from the records that
the learned counsel for the appellant has not paid
costs. Though the appeal is of the year 2019, it
seems that the appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
SD/-
JUDGE NB*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!