Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3812 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7 T H DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
R.F.A.NO.100075/2017 (DEC. PART. & SEP.POSS)
BETWEEN:
MARUTI KRISHNAPPA SHINDE,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS,
1. PREMA W/O MARUTI SHINDE,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: BHUTTAR ONI, NAVALUR,
TQ and DIST: DHARWAD-580001.
2 . REKHA W/O DEVENDRAPPA JADHAV,
AGE: 43 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: KADANAKOPPA,
TQ: KALAGHATGI ,
DIST: DHARWAD-581204.
3 . BASAVARAJ S/O MARUTI SHINDE,
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: BHUTTAR ONI, NAVALUR,
TQ and DIST: DHARWAD-580001.
4 . SURESH S/O MARUTI SHINDE,
AGE: 36 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULT URE,
R/O: BHUTTAR ONI, NAVALUR,
TQ and DIST: DHARWAD-580001.
5 . MAHADEV S/O KRI SHNAPPA SHINDE,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S.
5A. SMT.PARWATI,
W/O MAHADEV SHINDE,
2
AGE: 53 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD.
5B. RAKESH S/O MAHADEV SHINDE,
AGE: 26 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE.
5C. ABISHEK S/O MAHADEV SHINDE,
AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
ALL ARE R/O: NAVALUR,
TQ and DIST: DHARWAD.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI MAHESH WODEYAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SMT.LAXMIBAI,
W/O DODDABASAVANTAPPA KAWADE,
AGE: 62 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: NEAR HANUM ANTHDEVAR GUDI,
KEHWAPUR, HUBBALLI-580023.
SMT.LELAWWA W/O SHIVAJI PETA,
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LR'S,
2. SHIVAJI S/O SANKAPPA PETA,
AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED,
3. SHANKAR S/O SHI VAJI PETA
AGE: 43 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULT URE,
4. SURESH S/O SHIVAJI PETA
AGE: 40 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULT URE,
2 - 4 ARE R/O: ADYAPAK NAGAR,
NARAGUNDA, DIST : GADAG-582207.
5. GIRIJA W/O BALARAJ PATIL,
AGE: 38 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
3
R/O: R.C. NAGAR,
DHARWAD-580001.
6. SMT.KAMALAVVA,
W/O BABU PETA,
AGE: 55 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: KASAB SHANKARLINGANNA ONI ,
NARAGUND, DIST: GADAG-582207.
7. SMT.KRISHNAVVA,
W/O PARASHURAM KAWADE,
AGE: 53 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: NEAR HANUM ANTH DEVAR GUDI ,
KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI-580023.
8. SMT.CHANDRAVVA,
W/O PARASHURAM SALUNKE,
AGE: 50 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: JAYANAGAR,
BEHIND OLD BUS STAND,
SHIGGOAN,
DIST: HAVERI-581205.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SANTOSH B.MANE, ADVOCAT E FOR R1 AND R3 TO
R8:
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96 OF C.P.C., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 17.12.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.15/2009 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRINCI PAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
C.J.M., DHARWAD, DECREEIN THE SUIT FILED FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COM ING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for parties submitted that
subject matter of appeal has been settled between
parties and a compromise petition is filed corporating
following terms:
"1. That in pursuance of amicable settlement the appellants agreed to give/allot to respondent No.1, 6, 7 and 8, 06 guntas of land each and legal heirs of Smt.Leelavva
are jointly entitle for and 06 guntas in Block No.80/1/2 out of 01 acre 30 guntas of Sattur village towards western side as shown in the Hand sketch map and they satisfied to the said allotment and they given up/relinquished their rights in other remaining suit properties with free will and wish. The said Hand sketch map is the part and parcel of this compromise petition. The shares of respondents No.1 to 8 are shown in said Hand sketch map with boundaries as described below:
I. (i) Respondent No.1 is allotted to 06 guntas of land in R.Sy.No.80/1/2 Sattur village and is bounded by:-
To the West -Property of Smt.Dharwadbai
To the North -Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South -Property of Ishwar W.Shindhe
(ii) Respondents No.2 to 5 (Legal representatives of late Smt.Leelavva w/o Shivaji Pete) are jointly allotted to 06 guntas of land in R.Sy.No.80/1/2 of Sattur village and is bounded by:-
To the East -Plot of Respondent No.6
To the West -Plot of Respondent No.1
To the North -Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South -Property of Ishwar W.Shindhe
II.(iii) Respondent No.6 is allotted to 06 guntas of land in R.Sy.No.80/1/2 Sattur village and is bounded by:-
To the East -Plot of Respondent No.7
To the North -Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South -Property of Ishwar W Shindhe
guntas of land in R.Sy.No.80/1/2 Sattur village and is bounded by :-
To the East -Plot of Respondent No.8
To the West -Plot of Respondent No.6
To the North -Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South -Property of Ishwar W Shindhe
IV. (v) Respondent No.8 is allotted to 06 guntas of land in R.Sy.No.80/1/2 Sattur village and is bounded by:-
To the East -Remaining property of R.Sy.No.80/1/2
To the West -Plot of Respondent No.7
To the North -Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South -Property of Ishwar W.Shindhe
Remaining 40 guntas of land in R.Sy. No.80/1/2 is divided into two parts between appellants and appellant Nos.1 to 4 are agreed to take the northern side half portion and appellant No.5(a) to (c) are agreed to take the southern side half portion as shown in the hand sketch map. The property allotted to the share of appellant Nos.1 to 4 is bounded by:-
To the East - Property of SDM Dental College
To the West - Plot of Respondent No.8
To the North - Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South -Property of Applnt.No.5(a) to (c)
The property allotted to the share of appellant No.5 (a) to (c) is bounded by:-
To the East - Property of SDM Dental college
To the West - Plot of Respondent No.8
To the North - Property of Narayan Shindhe
To the South - Ishwar W Shindhe
It made clear that all the parties to the compromise have right to use cart way - 15 feet road as shown in the hand sketch map as EFGH in R.Sy.No.80/1/2.
V. In R.Sy.No.810/2 of Navalur village, Appellant No.1 to 4's share is shown in Hand sketch map as C D E F measuring 02 acres 10 guntas. The boundaries of said land are:-
To the East -The property of Ganapati Shindhe
To the North - The property of Manjunath Hanasi
To the South - The property of Jayapal Hanasi
In the said land Appellant Nos.5 (a) to (c)'s share is shown in Hand sketch map as ABCD measuring 02 acres 10 guntas. The boundaries of said land are:-
To the East -The property of Appellants No.1 to 4
To the West -The property of Shankar Shindhe & Ishwar Shindhe
To the North -The land of Manjunath Hanasi
To the South - The property of Jayapal Hanasi
In BI No 508/2 of Navalur village :-
The Appellant No.1 to 4's share measuring 04 acres 05 guntas is the property situated between "C D E F" as shown in Hand sketch map. The boundaries of said land are -
To the East -The property of one Fakkirappa Byalal
To the West -The property of one Basappa Itigatti
To the North -The property of one Shankar Shindhe
To the South -The property of one Appellant No.5(a) to (c)
In the said land ( BI No.508/2 of Navalur village) the Appellant No.5 (a) to (c) are entitled for 03 acres 34 guntas of the property situated between ABCD as shown in Hand sketch map. The boundaries of said land are:-
To the East -The property of one Fakkirappa Byalal
To the West -The property of one Shekhappa Itigatti
To the North -The property of one
To the South -The property of one Shekhappa Shindhe
VII. 1. In Block No.810/4 the appellants family is having only 13 guntas of land. It is in joint ownership and possession of appellants. It is kept jointly to appellants No 1 to 4 and 5(a) to
(c).
2. That, the respondents 1 to 8 hereby agrees that they will not claim any right, title or interest in or over the remaining suit properties i.e., Bl No 810/2, 508/2 and 810/4 of Navalur village and remaining 01 acre part of BI No 80/1/2 of Sattur village.
3. That, parties herein agreed that in view of this compromise entered between them the respondents 1 to 8 have no right, title or
interest in or over the BI No 810/2, 508/2 and 810/4 of Navalur village and remaining part of BI No 80/1/2 of Sattur village and declares that appellants are the absolute owners and in peaceful possession and they are entitled to deal with those properties in the manner deemed fit to them and they shall enjoy the same as absolute owners and they shall got enter their names in concerned revenue records.
4. That, both parties have agreed to cooperate in getting their names entered in the concerned revenue records pertaining to their respective allotted properties as per this compromise decree."
2. Appellants no.1 to 4 and 5(a) to (c),
respondents no.1 and 3 to 8 are present and are
identified by their respective counsel.
3. I have perused terms of settlement. Same
are found to be lawful and in the best interest of
parties.
4. Parties have stated that compromise has
been entered into out of their free will and volition
without there being any threat, coercion or undue
influence from anybody.
5. Compromise petition is accepted. Appeal is
allowed, judgment and decree in O.S.No.15/2009 is
modified in terms of compromise petition.
Registry to draw decree incorporating the terms
of compromise.
SD/-
JUDGE
CLK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!