Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9850 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1514 OF 2017
BETWEEN
SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.,
P.B. ROAD, NEAR BILAL COMPOUND,
DAVANAGERE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER,
MR. GIRISH K.V.,
S/O. VEERABHADRAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS WORKING AS
ASSISTANT CREDIT MANAGER OF
SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
AT 2ND FLOOR, K.H. ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 027. ... APPELLANT
[BY SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE]
AND
SRI. KRISHNA @ KRISHNA MURTHY T.,
S/O. THIPPANNA (OWNER MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA),
R/O. YARAVANAGATHIHALLI VILLAGE,
KOLKUNTE POST - 577 002,
DAVANAGERE TALUK & DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT
[BY SRI. JAGADISHA S.G., ADVOCATE]
***
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4)
OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF
ACQUITTAL DATED 07.04.2017 PASSED IN C.C. NO.322/2014
PASSED BY THE HON'BLE J.M.F.C. (III COURT) AT DAVANAGERE
AND ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE/PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred by the complainant praying
to set aside the judgment and order dated 07.04.2017
passed in C.C. No.322/2014 by the Court of J.M.F.C. (III
Court) at Davangere, whereby the respondent/accused
was acquitted of an offence punishable under Section
138 of N.I. Act.
2. The learned counsel appearing for both the
parties as well as the parties are present before the
Court. A joint memo has been filed signed by the learned
counsel as well as the respective parties stating that the
parties have mutually agreed to negotiate the matter for
settlement of their dispute once for all and in terms of
the settlement the respondent is paying a sum of
Rs.1,30,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Thousand only)
to the complainant/appellant by way of cash.
3. Mr. Girish K.V., representing the appellant/
complainant who is present before the Court submits
that he has received the amount and therefore, the
complainant will not precipitate the matter further. He
submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Joint memo is placed on record.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HB/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!