Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9727 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
WRIT APPEAL NO.173 OF 2021 (GM-SLUM)
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.35483 OF 2014 (GM-SLUM)
BETWEEN:
SMT. M NAGARATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.130,
6TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,
MALLESWARAM,
BANGALORE - 560 003
... APPELLANT
(BY. SMT. NALEENA LAGAN, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT
K G ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 009
3. KARNATAKA SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD
BANGALORE RASHILDAR STREET
2
SHESHADRIPURAM
BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED
BY ITS PRESIDENT
B S MUNIYAPPA DEAD BY LRS
4. SHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
S/O LATE B S MUNIYAPPA
5. JAGADISH
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
6. SOMESH
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
4(a) TO 4(c) ARE SONS OF
LATE B S MUNIYAPPA
AND RESIDENT OF
DOORAVANI NAGAR
VIJINAPURA POST
K R PURAM
BANGALORE-560 049
7. DR B R AMBEDKAR
WELFARE ASSOCIATION
JYOTHIPURA
BANGALORE-560 016
REPRESENTED BY
ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.RAJASHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI. V.ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR C/R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4
OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO a)
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08/12/2020 IN WP NO.
35483/2014 (GM-SLUM) PASSED BY THE HON'BLE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT; b)
SET ASIDE THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
04.06.2013, BEARING NO.KSACR.21/1991-92
3
GAZETTED ON 18.07.2013 AT ANNEXURE-J OF THE
WRIT PETITION ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2; c)
CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT SAID TO
HAVE BEEN PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN
CASE NO.KSACR.NO.21/1991-92 DATED 01.08.2012
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K OF THE WRIT PETITION
AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant even when
the matter is called in the second round.
It appears that appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the same is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Mds/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!