Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9376 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5439/2018
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5445/2018 (LAC)
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5439/2018
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER
CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
MANDYA - 571 401.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G M ANANDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. HANUMEGOWDA
S/O JAVAREGOWDA
MAJOR
SHIVALLI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI
MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 571 401.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MANDYA DISTRICT
MANDYA - 571 401.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MANDYA DISTRICT
MANDYA - 571 401.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.T.CHETHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. VENKAT SATYANARAYAN A, HCGP FOR R2 AND R3)
-2-
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.31.05.2017 PASSED ON LAC NO.1/13
ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CJM,
MANDYA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER
REFERENCE U/S.18(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5445/2018
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER
CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
MANDYA - 571 401.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G M ANANDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. CHANNEGOWDA
S/O. KADEGOWDA
MAJOR
KALENAHALLI VILLAGE
KOTHATHI HOBLI
MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT-571401.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MANDYA DISTRICT
MANDYA - 571 401.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MANDYA DISTRICT
MANDYA - 571 401.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.T.CHETHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. VENKAT SATYANARAYAN A, HCGP FOR R2 AND R3)
-3-
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.31.05.2017 PASSED ON LAC
NO.6/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
CJM, MANDYA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER
REFERENCE U/S.18(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
THESE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALS COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed
memos dated 20.07.2021 for withdrawal of these appeals
stating that the parties have settled the matters out of the
Court and the compensation payable in terms of the
impugned award has been paid to the claimants pursuant
to such out of Court settlement. The memos may be
accepted and the appeals disposed of.
Insofar as the refund, the learned counsel for the
appellant relies upon the amended provisions of Section 66
of the Karnataka Court-Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958,
the statement of objects and the reasons stated for the
amendment as also the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in The High Court of Judicature of Madras, Rep.
by its Registrar General Vs. M.C.Subramaniam & Ors.
reported in Special Leave Petition (CIVIL) Nos.3063-3064
of 2021 .
On perusal of these, and because of the submissions
that the respective claimants have been paid the
corresponding amounts in terms of the out of Court
settlement, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn and
the office is directed to refund Court fee paid to the
appellant.
SD/-
JUDGE
RB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!