Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9254 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
RSA No.200323/2019
BETWEEN:
REVANSIDDAYYA
S/O SIDRAMAYYA HIREMATH,
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HAVANOOR VILLAGE,
TQ: AFZALPUR, DIST: KALABURAGI.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MAHADEV S.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. NINGAMMA
W/O SHIVARANJANAYYA,
AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: DADAGI, TQ: BHALKI,
DIST: BIDAR.
2. SMT. KASTURIBAI
W/O SHANTALINGAYYA,
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: NADI SINNUR,
TQ. & DIST: KALABURAGI.
3. SMT. SHANTABAI
W/O MAHADEVAYYA MATH,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: PANEGAON,
TQ: & DIST: KALABURAGI.
4. SMT. MAHANTAMMA
W/O MALLIKARNUNAYYA MATH,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
2
R/O: VIDYANAGAR COLONY,
BHAVANI NAGAR, BIDAR, DIST: BIDAR.
5. SMT. CHANDRAKALA
W/O GURUBASAYYA HIREMATH,
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: BHAIRAMADAGI, TQ: AFZALPUR,
DIST: KALABURAGI.
6. SMT. SAROJA W/O MALLAYYA HAVANOOR,
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
C/O: GURUSHANTAYYA MADAK,
R/O: KUMASI, TQ: & DIST: KALABURAGI.
7. MONU S/O RAMU CHAWAN,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HAVANOOR VILLAGE,
TQ: AFZALPUR, DIST: KALABURAGI.
8. BASAYYA S/O SIDRAMAYYA MATHAPATI,
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HAVANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. AFZALPUR,
DIST: KALABURAGI.
9. DEVINDRA S/O BAILAPPA,
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HAVANOOR VILLAGE, TQ: AFZALPUR,
DIST: KALABURAGI.
10. SMT. AMBABAI D/O BAILAPPA,
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: HAVANOOR VILLAGE, TQ: AFZALPUR,
DIST: KALABURAGI.
11. SMT. SHANTABAI D/O BAILAPPA,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: HAVANOOR VILLAGE, TQ: AFZALPUR,
DIST: KALABURAGI.
12. SMT. KALAVATI
W/O GURUSHANTAYYA HIREMATH,
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
3
R/O: SUBHASH CHOWK,
BRAHMAPUR, KALABURAGI.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF CPC, PRAYING THAT THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT SHAHAPUR IN
R.A.NO.01/2017 DATED 25.07.2017 MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE
AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY PRL.
CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT AT SHAHAPUR IN O.S.NO.48/2006
DATED 11.11.2016.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant remained absent for the second time, even when the case was called in the afternoon session.
This appeal is of the year 2019. In spite of granting sufficient opportunity, office objections have not been complied. It appears, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KGR*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!