Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shantavva W/O Shivappa Nayak vs The Executive Engineer, Minor ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 11127 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11127 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Shantavva W/O Shivappa Nayak vs The Executive Engineer, Minor ... on 26 July, 2022
Bench: H.P.Sandesh
                               -1-




                                        MFA No. 21915 of 2012


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

            DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2022

                            BEFORE
             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
     MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 21915 OF 2012 (WC-)
BETWEEN:

1.     SHANTAVVA W/O SHIVAPPA NAYAK
       AGE: 38 YRS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O MURADI TANDA, TALUK:
       MUNDARAGI, DIST: GADAG

2.     KUMAR ANAND S/O SHIVAPPA NAYAK
       AGE: 19 YRS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O MURADI TANDA, TALUK:
       MUNDARAGI,DIST: GADAG

3.     SITA D/O SHIVAPPA NAYAK
       AGE.18 YRS, OCC. EDUCATION,R/O MURADI TANDA,
       TALUK. MUNDARAGI,DIST. GADAG

4.     NAVEEN S/O SHIVAPPA NAYAK
       AGE. 13 YRS, OCC.EDUCATION,
       R/O MURADI TANDA, TALUK. MUNDARAGI,
       DIST. GADAG, APPELLANT NO.4 IS REP/BY APPELLANT
       NO.1, NOW APPELLANT NO.4 IS MAJOR HENCE
       APPELLANT NO.4 IS DISCHARGED FROM GURADIAN.



                                                  ...PETITIONER'S

(BY SRI. GIRISH S HIREMATH.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION
       DEPARTMENT, DHARWAD DIVISION, DHARWAD

2.     S.V.BANDI, DWD CLASS I CONTRACTOR, PLOT NO.08
       VISHALNAGAR, BEHIND KSRTC, WORKSHOP, TQ: DIST:
       BIJAPUR
                                  -2-




                                          MFA No. 21915 of 2012


3.    YALLAVVA W/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL
      SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
      3A. MANJUNATHGOUDA BASANGOUDA PATIL,AGE. 45,
      OCC. AGRI, R/O. GUDIHAL,
      POST. NITTUR, TQ. RANEBENNUR,
      DIST. HAVERI.

                                                 ...RESPONDENT'S

(BY SRI.RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP FOR R1.,

       SRI.D.M.BANDI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;

       R3 DECEASED; R3(A) SERVED)

       THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 30(1) OF THE W.C.ACT AGAINST
THE        JUDGMENT     AND    DECREE    DATED    17/6/2010      IN
WCL/F.NO.16/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND
COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION, GADAG.

       THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY. THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.

                              JUDGMENT

Though the matter is listed for admission with the

consent of both the counsel the matter is taken up for final

hearing.

2. This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and award

dated 17/6/2010 passed by the Commissioner and Labour

Officer, Workmens' compensation, Gadag (For short the

Commissioner) in WC.No.16/2007.

MFA No. 21915 of 2012

3. Factual matrix of the case are that, Shivappa S/o

Hariyappa Nayak was an employee of 2nd respondent. On

17/2/2005, he was travelling in a tractor and trailer bearing

No.KA-27/T-2651 and 2652 to bring stones, the vehicle was

driven by the driver as per the direction of respondent No.2, at

that time tractor and trailer toppled into ditch and in the said

incident, he succumbed to injuries due to rash and negligent

driving by the driver of tractor and trailer. On account of death

of Shivappa S/o Hariyappa Nayak, claimants filed claim petition

before the Commissioner to award just and proper

compensation. However, the Commissioner has erred in

assessing the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.3,000/-

p.m. and hence, the present appeal is filed.

4. The substantial question law arises in this appeal is,

whether the Commissioner has committed error in assessing

the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.3,000/- instead of

Rs.4,000/-?

5. Having heard the respective counsel and also on perusal

of the material on record would indicate that the incident was

MFA No. 21915 of 2012

taken place in the year 2005. The Commissioner while

assessing the compensation has taken monthly income of the

deceased at Rs.3,000/- p.m. However, learned counsel for

respondent No.1 contended that at the time of accident

deceased was getting bhatta of Rs.100/- per day and he was

aged about 40 years and hence, the Commissioner has rightly

assessed the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.3,000/-.

The said contention cannot be accepted for the reason that

statute itself provides salary of Rs.4,000/- per month for

coolies and as such, the Commissioner ought to have taken

monthly income of the deceased at Rs.4,000/-. Hence,

determining compensation payable to the claimants by

assessing monthly income of the deceased at Rs.4,000/-, the

claimants are entitled for total compensation as under:

4,000/- x 50/100 x184.17= Rs.3,68,340/-

6. In view of the above, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part.

MFA No. 21915 of 2012

ii) The judgment and award dated 17/6/200 passed by the

Commissioner and Labour Officer, Workmens' compensation,

Gadag in WC.No.16/2007 is hereby modified.

iii) The claimants are entitled for total compensation of

Rs.3,68,340/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from

30 days from the date of accident i.e. on 19/03/2005 till

realization.

iv) The total compensation along with interest shall be

deposited by the Insurance Company within four weeks from

the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

v) Registry to draw award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

VB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter