Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10963 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI
C.C.C.NO.481 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. M/S BIG BAGS INTERNATIONAL
PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS
OFFICE AT BLOCK NO.8,
EPIP INDUSTRIAL AREA, GANJIMAT,
MANGALURU - 574 144
REPRESENTED BY ITS GM-FACILITY
MR SHRINATH SHASHIDHARA
ADYANTHAYA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O LATE NARAYANA ADYANTHAYA
2. M/S ADVANCE TECHNOLOGIES
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PLOT NO.12(P6),
EPIP INDUSTRIAL AREA, GANJIMAT,
MANGALURU - 574 144
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATURE
MR SHRINATH SHASHIDHARA
ADYANTHAYA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O LATE NARAYANA ADYANTHAYA.
... COMPLAINANTS
(BY SMT. LATHA S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
1. MR SRINIVASALU
MEMBER SECRETARY
KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PARISARA BHAVAN
#49, 5TH FLOOR, CHURCH STREET
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. MR. KEERTHI KUMAR
ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER
KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PARISARABHAVANA, IOB,
BAIKAMBAPADY INDUSTRIAL AREA,
RO-MANGALURU - 575 011.
... ACCUSED
(BY SRI. MAHESH A. CHOWDARY, ADVOCATE)
---
THIS CCC FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN FOR
CONTEMPT OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 21.01.2022 IN WP
NO.876/2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF
THIS HON'BLE COURT BY ISSUING A NOTICE TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THE ACCUSED SHOULD NOT BE HELD GUILTY
OF CONTEMPT IN TERMS OF SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 (ANNEXURE-A) AND
PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
3
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt. Latha S. Shetty, learned counsel for the
complainants.
Sri. Mahesh A. Chowdary, learned counsel for
the accused.
This petition has been filed for non compliance of
the order dated 21.01.2022 passed in
W.P.No.876/2022.
2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly
submitted that the aforesaid order has been complied
with.
3. The aforesaid submission is placed on
record.
4. We are, therefore, not inclined to proceed
further with the contempt petition. Accordingly, the
same is disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Mds/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!