Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1985 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
R.S.A.NO.5609/2012 (PAR)
BETWEEN
SMT.PARVATEVVA @ PARATEVVA
W/O SAKARAPPA MANNI,
AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
R/O GULEDAGUDDA, TQ: BADAMI,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587201.
... APPELLANT
(SMT.PARVATEVVA @ PARATEVVA
W/O SAKARAPPA-APPELLANT)
AND
1. SRI YALLAPPA
S/O KANAKAPPA ADIN,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
1(A) MALLAVVA W/O YALLAPPA ADIN,
AGE : 36 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ : HUNAGUND.
1(B) PARASAPPA S/O YALLAPPA ADIN,
AGE : 16 YEARS,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ : HUNAGUND.
SINCE MINOR REP.BY HIS MOTHER
RESPONDNET NO.1(A).
2. SMT.KASTUREVVA
W/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA ADIN,
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587 203.
3. YALLAVVA D/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA ADIN
2
AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587 203.
4. SHIDDAMMA D/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA ADIN,
AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: NIL.,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587 203.
5. KANAKAPPA
D/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA ADIN,
AGE: 12 YEARS, OCC: NIL.,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587 203.
6. HUCHCHAMMA
D/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA ADIN,
AGE: 10 YEARS, OCC: NIL.,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587 203.
7. HUCHCHAPPA
S/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA ADIN
AGE: 8 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
R/O KAMATAGI, TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587 203.
SINCE MINOR REP. NO.4 TO 7 ARE MINORS
REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER,
MGM RESPONDENT NO.2
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI M.B.KANAVI, ADVOCATE FOR R.2 & R.3)
(NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS.1(A) & R(B) : SERVED)
(RESPONDENT NOS.4 TO R.7 : MINORS R/BY M/G R.2)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING THIS COURT TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 16.01.2012 PASSED
IN R.A.NO.20/2008 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HUNAGUND
BY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
15.02.2008 IN O.S.NO.187/2002 BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.),
HUNAGUND BY DECREEING THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
: JUDGMENT :
By order dated 09.12.2021 this Court had
permitted the learned counsel for the appellant on
record to retire from the case and registry was
directed to show the name of appellant in the cause
list.
Though legal notice was issued on 11.08.2020
and the same is served on the appellant, he has not
taken any steps to engage any other counsel. It is also
forthcoming from the records that while taking back
the papers, the appellant has also signed and
acknowledged for having taken back the papers.
Therefore, this Court would find that, the appellant is
not at all interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non
prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE EM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!