Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1583 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN
W.A. NO.1107 OF 2021 (T-RES)
IN
W.P.NO.8625 OF 2021 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NO.128A, NORHT BLOCK
NEW DELHI 110001.
2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES
AND CUSTOMS
THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN
NORTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI 110001.
3. GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL
FIFTH FLOOR, TOWER II
JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING
JANAPATH ROAD
CONNAUGHT PLACE
NEW DELHI 110001.
4. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES
BANGALORE EAST
C.R. BUILDING
2
QUEENS ROAD
BENGALURU 560001.
5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES
EAST DIVISION-7
BANGALORE BUS STAND
HAL AIRPORT ROAD, DOMLUR
BENGALURU 560071.
.... APPELLANTS
(BY MR. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA)
AND:
1. M/S TOTAL ENVIRONMENT LIVING SPACES PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT
IMAGINE NO.78, ITPL MAIN ROAD
EPIP ZONE, WHITEFIELD ROAD
BENGALURU 560066
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
SRI. SUMIT CHOWDHURU
S/O SRI. S.N. CHOWDHURY
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT NO.306,TEAM EMERALD 7
RUSTAMBAG, MAIN ROAD
KODIHALLI, BENGALURU 560017.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU 560001.
... RESPONDENTS
---
THIS W.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC.4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER, DATED 25/08/2021, PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.8625/2021.
THIS W.A. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS
DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Mr.Jeevan J.Neeralgi, learned Additional Government
Advocate for the appellants.
This intra Court appeal under Section 4 of the
Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 has been filed against an
order dated 25.08.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge
in W.P.No.8625/2021.
2. When the matter was taken up today, learned
counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the
controversy involved in this appeal is covered by a Division
Bench decision of this Court dated 01.02.2021 passed in
W.A.No.461/2020 (T-Res).
3. For the reasons assigned in the aforesaid judgment
and with a view to maintain parity, the appeal fails and is
hereby be dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!