Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11556 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
R.P. NO.576 OF 2022
IN
W.A. NO.1017 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHIKKABOVI
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S.
1(a). SIDDARAMA
S/O LATE SRI. CHIKKABOVI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
1(b). KANNAIAH
S/O LATE SRI. CHIKKABOVI
AGED 65 YEARS.
1(c). RAJU
S/O LATE SRI. CHIKKABOVI
AGED 65 YEARS.
1(d). SRINIVASA
S/O LATE SRI. CHIKKABOVI
AGED 65 YEARS.
ALL ARE R/AT LINGAMBUDIPALYA
JAYAPURA HOBLI
2
MYSURU TALUK
MYSURU - 570 021.
... PETITIONERS
(BY MR. CHRISTOPHER NOEL A, ADV.,)
AND:
1. SRI. C.Y. SHIVEGOWDA
S/O LATE VYKUNTEGOWDA
AGED 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.38, USA RESIDENCY
J C S T M BLOCK
ADICHUNCHANAGIRI ROAD
KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU - 560 021.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MYSORE DISTRICT
MYSORE - 570 021.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
MYSORE SUB DIVISION
MYSORE - 570 021.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. SANGAMESH R.B. ADV., FOR C/R1)
---
THIS R.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER
47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT
DATED 02.03.2022 IN W.A. NO.1017/2021 ON THE FILE OF
THIS HON'BLE COURT. ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION AND
REHEAR THE W.A.NO.1017/2021 OR REMAND THE MATTER
BACK TO THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE TO REHEAR THE
W.P.NO.30459/2015. GRANT COSTS OF THIS REVIEW
PETITION AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS DEEMED FIT IN
THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE.
THIS R.P. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This petition has been filed seeking review
of the order dated 02.03.2022 passed by this court in
W.P.No.1017/2021.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant
submitted that the sale deed was registered on
23.07.1997 and therefore, the delay in filing the
application under Section 5 of The Karnataka
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition
of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (hereinafter
referred to as 'the Act' for short) is 8 years and 10
months. However, the fact remains that the sale deed
was executed on 14.03.1997 but the same was
registered on 23.07.1997. There is a delay of 9 years
and 2 months in filing the application seeking
resumption of the land under the provisions of the
Act. The aforesaid delay has not been explained. The
order passed by the learned Single Judge neither
suffers from any jurisdictional infirmity nor any error
apparent on the face of the record warranting
interference of this court in exercise of review
jurisdiction.
In the result, the petition fails and is hereby
dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!