Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3387 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.207501 OF 2014 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
1 . DASTAGIR S/O LADLESAB
LR'S OF LADLESAB
AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
2 . RUKMUDDIN S/O LADLESAB
L.R'S OF LADLESAB
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
3 . SAIPAN S/O MULLA
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
4 . HANAMANTH S/O GANGARAM MARATHA
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
5 . GANGARAM S/O NAGUBA MARATHA
AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
6 . ASHOK S/O KHANDI PATIL
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
7 . JAGADEVI W/O VITHAL PATIL
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
2
8 . NARASINGH BABU PATIL
AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
9 . PRABHULING S/O TUKARAM DHANAGAR
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
10 . BHAGANNA S/O KALLAPPA DHANAGAR
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
11 . HANAMANTH S/O KASHAPPA GODKE
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
12 . AMBAJI S/O LAXAMANNA DHANAGAR
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
13 . SHIVAPUTRA S/O SHARANAPPA PUJARI
AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
14 . SAIBANNA S/O MUTTAPPA PUJARI
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
15 . PRABHULING S/O TUKARAM DHANAGAR
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
16 . SHARNABAI W/O SHIVAMURTHE NIMBARGAE
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
17 . SUGALABAI W/O GANAPATI NIBARGE
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
18 . GANAPATI S/O HANAMANTHA NIMBARGE
AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
19 . BHARATI W/O GANAPATI
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
3
20 . SHARANAMMA RACHOTI L.R'S OF APPARAYA
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
21 . HANAMANTH S/O APPARAYA RACHOTI
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
22 . RAMACHANDRA S/O KASHAPPA GODKE
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
23 . REVANSIDDAPPA S/O KALLAPPA PUJARI
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
24 . SUSHILABAI W/O REVANSIDDAPPA PUJARI
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
25 . BASALINGAWWA W/O MALLIKARJUN
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
26 . HANAMANTH S/O KALLAPPA GHODKE
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
27 . BHIMAPPA @ BHIMASHA S/O MAHADEV DHANGAR
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
28 . AMBAJI S/O LAXMANA DHANAGAR
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
29 . SIDRAMAPPA S/O MUTTAPPA PUJARI
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
30 . BHIMAPPA @ BIRAPPA S/O MAHADEV DHANGAR
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
31 . BHAGANNA S/O KALLAPPA DHANAGAR
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
4
32 . BASAVARAJ S/O DATTA MARATHA
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
33 . RAMCHANDRA S/O MAHADEV JANKAR
AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
34 . YESHWANTH S/O MAHADEV JANKAR
AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
35 . RUKMINIBAI W/O HANAMANTHA
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
36 . CHANDAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRE GODKE
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
37 . BASAVARAJ S/O DATTU MARATHA
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
38 . UJWALA W/O BASAVARAJ MARATHA
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
39 . GURALINGAPPA HANAMANTHRAO
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
40 . RAMACHANDRA S/O AMARUTARAO
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
41 . SHAMARAO S/O VITHALRAO ACHALERI
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
42 . MANIK S/O VITHALA
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
43 . SIDRAMAPPA S/O SHIVALINGAPPA NIMBARGE
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
5
44 . HANAMANTHAPPA S/O SHIVAMURTHI
SINCE DIED HIS LRS
ERANNA S/O HANAMANTHAPPA
AGE : 45 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
45 . SHRIMANTH S/O MAHANTAPPA
AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
46 . VEERUPAKSHI S/O VEERAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
47 . SHIVALING S/O SHIVAMURATHI
SINCE DIED HIS LRS
SHIVAMURTHI S/O SHIVALING
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
48 . SHIVANAND S/O MAHANATAPPA NIMBARGE
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
49 . VISHWANATH S/O PRABHAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
50 . SHARNAPPA @ SHARNAYYA
SINCE DIED HIS LRS WIFE
VIMAL W/O SHARNAYYA
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRI.
51 . VISHAWANTH S/O PRABHAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
52 . MALLAYYA S/O PRABHAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
6
53 . BASAVANAYYA S/O PRABHAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
54 . SIDRAM S/O HUVAPPA PUJARI
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
55 . NARAYAN S/O UMAJI DHOR
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
56 . DATTU S/O UMAJI DHOR
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
57 . BASAVANNAYYA S/O PRABHAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
58 . DATTU OMAJI DHOR
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
59 . SHARANAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRA
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
60 . BHAGIRATI W/O RAVINDRA KULKARNI
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
61 . ARUNKUMAR S/O RAMRAO KULKARNI
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
62 . KISHENRAO S/O SHANKAAR RAO KULKARNI
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
63 . GURURAJ S/O SHANKERRAO KULKARNI
AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
64 . SRIRAM S/O SHENKAR RAO KULKARNI
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
7
65 . ANANTH S/O SHANKAR RAO KULKARNI
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC : AGRI.
66 . RAVINDRA S/O DATTATRAYA KULKARNI
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
67 . SRINIVASRAO S/O KISHANRAO KULKARNI
AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
68 . BHAGANNA
SINCE DIED HIS LRS WIFE LAXMIBAI
W/O BHAGANNA
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
69 . DHARM S/O HANAMANTH DHORE
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
70 . SHIVALLAL S/O RAMACHANDRA SINDE
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
71 . LAXMIBAI W/O BHAGANNA PUJARI
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
72 . SHANKARRAO
SINCE DIED HIS LRS
KISHANRAO S.KULKARNI
AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
73 . RATNABI S/O BHIMASHA JADAV
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
74 . BHIMRARAO S/O HANAMANTH JADAV
AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
8
75 . AMBAJI S/O HANAMANTH JADAV
AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
76 . SUVARNA W/O SHIVASHARANAPPA CHARE
AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
77 . SHIVASHARANAPPA S/O KUPENDRA CHARE
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
78 . GANGABAI W/O KUPENDRA CHARE
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
79 . PARABATI W/O IRANNA CHARE
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
80 . SIDRAMAPPA S/O GURUBASAPPA CHARE
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC : AGRI
ALL ARE R/O VILLAGE PADASAVAGI
TQ : ALAND, DIST : GULBARGA-585102
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. JIDAGE KAILASH C., ADV.)
AND
1 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
GULBARGA - 585101
2 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICE
SMALL AND MEDIUM IRRIGATION,
GULBARGA-585101
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, HCGP)
9
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING
TO QUASH THE 4(1) NOTIFICATION ORDER DATED
31.07.2014 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 IN THE
FILE No.KAM:VBHU:SWA/1/SA.NI/30/2013-14, VIDE
ANNEXURE-E WHILE ACQUIRING THE LANDS FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF WATER TANK AT
VILLAGE PADASAVALGI, TQ. ALAND, DIST. KALABURAGI.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioners filed this writ petition seeking to
quash the notification order dated 31.07.2014, passed
by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-E.
2. Facts giving rise to the filing of this petition
briefly stated are as under:
The petitioners are the owners and possessors of
land situated at Village Padasavalgi, Tq. Aland, Dist.
Kalaburagi. Respondent No.2 has issued a preliminary
notification dated 19.12.2013, under Section 4(1) of
the Land Acquisition Act ('the LA Act' for short), for
acquiring the lands of the petitioners. Petitioner
Nos.21 and 61 and others filed objections to the said
notification. Petitioner Nos.21 and 61 also filed writ
petitions in W.P.Nos.202467-202468/2014 challenging
the said notification. In the said writ petitions,
respondent filed a memo dated 05.04.2014, stating
that the Minor Irrigation Division, Gulbarga will not
undertake construction work of minor irrigation tank
at Padasavalagi, in the lands pertaining to the
petitioners. Respondent No.2 without considering the
objections filed by the petitioners and the memo filed
by them, has passed another notification order dated
31.07.2014, and no award was passed within two
years from the date of preliminary notification and
hence proceedings initiated under the LA Act stands
lapsed. Hence this writ petition to quash the order
dated 31.07.2014, vide Annexure-E.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned HCGP for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that though respondent No.2 has issued a preliminary
notification on 19.12.2013, no award was passed till
date. He further submits that as per Section 11A(1),
if no award is passed under Section 11 within a period
of two years, the acquisition proceedings shall lapse.
Hence, on these grounds, he prays to allow the
petition.
5. Per contra, learned HCGP fairly concedes that
respondent No.2 has not passed award within two
years from the date of publication of declaration.
6. Perused the records and considered the
submissions of learned counsel for the parties.
7. It is not in dispute that the respondent has
issued a preliminary notification on 19.12.2013,
acquiring the lands of the petitioners. Petitioners
have filed objections to the said notification. The
Collector has to pass an award as required under
Section 11 of the LA Act. Respondent No.2 has not
passed the award under Section 11 of the LA Act. If
no such award is passed within two years from the
date of publication and declaration, then the entire
proceedings for acquisition of land, shall lapse. When
the Government fails to pass an award within two
years from the date of preliminary notification, the
land will not vest with the Government and its title
remains with the owner. The acquisition proceedings
stands lapsed by virtue of provisions of Section 11(A)
of the LA Act. The said view is supported by the
judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
TIPPANNA NINGAPPA TUMMARMATTI & ORS. VS. THE
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT & ORS. [ILR 2016
(1) KAR 1170]. Admittedly, no award has been
passed under Section 11 of the LA Act. Hence the
entire acquisition proceedings initiated, shall lapse.
8. In view of the above discussion, the writ
petition is allowed. The notification under Section
4(1) of the LA Act, dated 31.07.2014, vide Annexure-
E, is hereby quashed.
SD/-
JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!