Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri G M Nagesh vs State By Nandagudi P S
2021 Latest Caselaw 2054 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2054 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Sri G M Nagesh vs State By Nandagudi P S on 31 May, 2021
Author: K.Natarajan
                      1


 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2021

                   BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN

      CRIMINAL PETITION No.1139/2021

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. G. M. NAGESH,
   S/O MARIYAPPA,
   AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
   R/AT C. T. GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
   KEMBALIGANAHALLI,
   NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
   BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
   BENGALURU - 560 085.

2. MARIYAPPA,
   S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
   AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
   R/AT C. T. GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
   KEMBALIGANAHALLI,
   NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
   BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
   BENGALURU - 560 085.

3. SMT. S. N. BHARATHI,
   W/O G. M. NAGESH,
   AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
   R/AT C. T. GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
   KEMBALIGANAHALLI,
   NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
                        2


  BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
  BENGALURU - 560 085.
                                   ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GANESHA G. G, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE BY NANDAGUDI P S,
   REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
   HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
   BANGALORE - 560 091.

2. SMT. AMBIKA,
   W/O SAMPATH,
   AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
   R/AT C. T. GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE,
   NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK ETQ,
   BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
   BENGALURU - 560 085.
                                  ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONERS PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS
ON BAIL IN THE EVENT THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN
THE     EVENT     OF     THEIR    ARREST      IN
CR.NO.46/2020(SPL.C.NO.337/2020) REGISTERED BY
NANDAGUDI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU DISTRICT
FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 341,323,354(A),427,504,506
R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(w),(r),(s) OF
SC/ST(POA) AMENDMENT BILL, 2015.
     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                              3




                       ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

he is withdrawing the petition as the appeal is

maintainable and Criminal Petition is not maintainable.

2. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble

Division Bench of this Court in Crl.A.No.1078/2020,

appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes

and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act lies

and not Criminal Petition.

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as not

pressed/not maintainable with liberty to file appeal.

Sd/-

JUDGE cbc

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter