Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Assistant Executive Engineer vs The Deputy Lasour Commissioner
2021 Latest Caselaw 1961 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1961 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Assistant Executive Engineer vs The Deputy Lasour Commissioner on 24 May, 2021
Author: P.B.Bajanthri
                               1




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
         DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2021
                           BEFORE
      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI

        WRIT PETITION NO.8092/2015 (L-PG)
BETWEEN:

1.     ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
       CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD.,
       NO.20, HEMAVATHI LEFT CANAL
       SUB-DIVISION, K.R. PET TALUK,
       MANDYA DISTRICT - 571401.

2.     MANAGING DIRECTOR
       CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAMA LTD
       CAUVERY BHAVAN COMPLEX,
       GOKULAM 4TH STAGE,
       MYSORE - 570 001                     ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. K.S. BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE (NOC))

AND:

1.     THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER
       APPELLATE AUTHORITY, REGION-II,
       "KARMIKA BHAVAN",
       BANNERGATTA MAIN ROAD,
       BANGALORE - 560 029.

2.     ASST. LABOUR COMMISSIONER
       AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY,
       UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT,
       MYSORE DIVISION, MYSORE - 570 001.

3.     SMT. SUSHEELAMMA,
       AGED ABOUT MAJOR
       W/O LATE VISHAKANTE GOWDA,

3A.    SRI. YOGISH,
       AGED ABOUT MAJOR
       S/O LATE VISHAKANTE GOWDA,
                               2




3B.   SMT. MEENAKSHI,
      AGED ABOUT MAJOR
      D/O LATE VISHAKANTE GOWDA,

3C.   SMT. BHAGYA,
      AGED ABOUT MAJOR
      D/O LATE VISHAKANTE GOWDA,

3D.   SRI. HARISH,
      AGED ABOUT MAJOR
      S/O LATE VISHAKANTE GOWDA,

3E.   SMT. INDRA,
      AGED ABOUT MAJOR
      D/O LATE VISHAKANTE GOWDA,

ALL ARE R/AT SARANGI GRAMA,
K.R. PET TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401                    ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2.
    SMT. VIGNESHWAR S. SHASTRI FOR R-3
    R-3(B) SERVED & UNREPRESENTED. V/O DTD: 20/04/18
    NOTICE TO R-3 (A, C, D & E) DISPENSED WITH)

     THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS
ON THE FILE OF R-1, LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND THE APPELLATE
AUTHORITY BANGALORE IN RESPECT OF APPEAL NO. UKAB-2/PGA/CR-
237/2013-14 AND ON THE FILE OF THE R-2 ASSISTANT LABOUR
COMMISSIONER IN RESPECT OF NO. PGA/CR-92/2010-11 AND ETC.,

      THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B
GROUP    PHYSICAL   HEARING/VIDEO   CONFERENCING     HEARING
(OPTIONAL), THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
                                    3




                               ORDER

In the instant petition, petitioners have prayed for the

following reliefs:-

1. Call for the records on the file of 1st respondent, Labour Commissioner and the Appellate Authority Bangalore in respect of Appeal No. UKAB-2/PGA/CR-237/2013-14 and on the file of the 2nd Respondent Assistant Labour Commissioner in respect of No. PGA/CR-92/2010-11.

2. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, quashing the order at Annexure-A dated 31.07.2013 passed by the Respondent Assistant Labour Commissioner and Gratuity Authority Mysore Division, Mysore in PGA/CR-92/2010-11 and at Annexure-B dated 27.10.2014 passed by the 1st respondent, Deputy Labour Commissioner and the Appellate Authority in Appeal No. UKAB-2/PGA/CR- 237/2013-14.

2. In identical matter, petitioners have suffered an

order and it was subject matter of W.A.No.100/2013 wherein

also they have suffered order.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

petitioners intends to file a Special Leave Application before the

Apex Court against the order passed in W.A.No.100/2013 and

seeks time in this matter. Such speculative relief cannot be

considered in order to adjourn the matter. The matter is squarely

covered by decision in W.A.No.100/2013. At this juncture,

learned counsel for respondent No.3 on instructions submitted

that pursuant to the impugned order the monetary benefit has

been extended to respondent No.3 as on this date.

In view of these facts and circumstances, writ petition

stands disposed of in terms of judgment in W.A.No.100/2013.

Petitioners are at liberty to make necessary application for

revival of W.P.No.8092/2015 in the event of any order passed in

favour of the petitioners by the Apex Court, arising out of

W.A.No.100/2013.

Sd/-

JUDGE

KPS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter