Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1723 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9 T H DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M .I.ARUN
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100316/ 2018
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. JAYASHREE
W/O. BALAKRISHNA NIMBALKAR
AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: SAI APARTMENT,
NEAR YERANDOLE GATE,
BRAHAMANPURI ,
TQ: MIRAJ, DIST: SANGALI.
2. SMT.VAISHALI
W/O. YASHWANTRAO SAVANT,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
AND AGRICULTURE,
R/O: RATNA HOSPITAL NARWAD ROAD,
MAISHAL, TALUK MIRAJ,
DIST: SANGALI .
3. MISS. RUPALI
D/O. BALAKRISHNA NIMBALKAR,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: NI L,
R/O: SAI APARTMENT,
NEAR YERANDOLE GATE,
BRAHAMANPURI ,
TQ: MIRAJ, DIST: SANGALI,
SINCE MENTALLY UNSOUND,
2
REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND
AND GENETIVE MOTHER
APPELLANT NO.1 HEREIN.
...APPELLANTS.
(BY MISS.CHITRA M. GOUNDALKAR, FOR
SHRI NEELENDRA.D.GUNDE, ADVOCATE.)
AND:
1. SHALAN D/O. RAGHUNATH KRISHNARAO PATIL
CLAIMING HERSELF TO BE THE WIFE
ANURADHA W/ O BALAKRISHNA NIMBALKAR,
AGED ABOUT: 64 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: BHAT GALLI , NIPPANI ,
TQ: CHIKK ODI.
2. SMT.BHARGAVI W/ O. UDAY PATIL
AGED ABOUT: 45 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: DARAWAD, POST NILAPAN,
TQ: BUDARGAD, DIST: KOLHAPUR.
3. SMT.PRASANNA W/O. VIJAY SAVANT
AGED ABOUT: 43 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: HIMMAT BHADUR PARISAR,
SBI COLONY KOLHAPUR,
DIST: KOLHAPUR.
4. VEERENDRA BALAKRISHNA NIMBALKAR
AGED ABOUT: 40 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULT URE,
R/O: BHAT GALLI , NIPPANI ,
TQ: CHIKK ODI.
5. PADMAJA W/O. SUSHANT SAWANT
AGED ABOUT: 36 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: SECTOR NO.10,
NEAR BVA PUBLIC SCHOOL,
AIROLI NAVI MUMBAI.
...RESPONDENTS.
(BY SHRI RAMESH I. ZIRALI, ADVOCATE.)
3
THIS REGULAR FI RST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 30.6.2018, PASSED IN O.S.NO.11/ 2018, ON
THE FILE OF SENI OR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NI PANI,
ETC.,.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, SRI K.SOMASHEKAR, J, PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Miss.Chitra Goundalkar, for
the appellants, is present before the Court
physically and representing the counsel
Shri Neelendra D. Gunde, for the appellants, who
is on record. In this matter, the counsel files a
memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal as not
pressed. The memo is placed on record.
Consequently, the counsel is permitted to
withdraw the appeal as not pressed. Ordered
accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE Mrk/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!