Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2992 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
MFA No.200172/2017 (MV)
BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
OPP. MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA,
STATION ROAD, KALABURAGI.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. DEEPAK V. BARAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
01. NABI PATEL S/O BHASHA SAB
AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: COOLIE
02. ZAIRABEE W/O NABI PATEL
AGE: 33 YEARS OCC: HOUSEHOLD & COOLIE
BOTH R/O: KOBAL VILLAGE
TQ: JEWARGI DIST:KALABURAGI
NOW RESIDING AT PLOT NO.79,
DEVA NAGAR, OLD JEWARGI ROAD,
KALABURAGI - 585 103.
2
03. RAJSHEKHAR S/O MALLIKARJUN
AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: OWNER OF VEHICLE
BEARING NO.KA.23/8834
R/O: HEROOR (B),
TQ & DIST: KALABURAGI - 586 103
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHAITANYKUMAR C.M. ADV., FOR R1 & R2
BY SRI. M. M. ALLUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED
UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
1988 PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE MISC. FIRST
APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO MODIFY THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.11.2016 PASSED BY
THE COURT OF THE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
M.A.C.T. AT KALABURAGI IN MVC.NO.610/2014 AND
CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO DISCHARGE THE
APPELLANT FROM ITS LIABILITY TO PAY THE
COMPENSATION AND ALSO BE PLEASED TO REDUCE THE
COMPENSATION SUITABLY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
3
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the Insurer challenging the
liability imposed upon it to pay the compensation awarded
by the Tribunal in terms of its order dated 11.11.2016 in
MVC.No.610/2014.
02. The Tribunal had considered the claim of
compensation in respect of the death of minor son of
respondents No.1 and 2 herein. The Tribunal after
considering the evidence on record had awarded the
following compensation:-
Sl. Heads Amount
No.
1 Towards Loss of Dependency Rs.5,10,000/-
2 Towards Loss of Love and Rs.0,20,000/-
Affection
3 Towards Transportation of dead Rs.0,25,000/-
body and funeral expenses
Total Rs.5,55,000/-
03. The Tribunal directed the Insurer to pay the
compensation along with interest.
04. Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Award of
the Tribunal, the present appeal is filed.
05. It is the contention of the Insurer that the
driver of the offending vehicle did not possess the required
endorsement to drive a Transport Vehicle but was
authorized to drive only a Light Motor Vehicle. This
contention of the Insurer is squarely covered by the
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2017)
14 SCC 663 in the case of Mukund Dewangan vs.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited.
In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
The amount in deposit is ordered to be transferred to
the Tribunal for necessary orders.
Sd/-
JUDGE KJJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!