Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2843 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.DESAI
RSA.NO.200402/2014 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SHEKAR S/O HULAGAPPA SHORAPUR
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: CARPENTER
R/O: JANATHA COLONY, JALAHALLI
TQ: DEVADURGA DIST: RAICHUR ...APPELLANT
(SRI. AJAYA KUMAR A.K., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MOULASAB S/O BUDDESAB BHAVIMANI
AGE: 50 YEARS OCC; AGRICULTURIST,
R/O: JANATHA COLONY, JALAHALLI
TQ: DEVADURGA DIST: RAICHUR-584 109.
...RESPONDENT
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING
TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY
THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAICHUR
(SITTING AT ITINERATE COURT, DEVADURGA) IN
R.A.NO.13/2012 DATED 20.09.2014 IN CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE,
DEVADURGA IN O.S.NO.31/2009 DATED 09.04.2012.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
JUDGMENT
Sri. Ajaykumar A. K., learned counsel for Sri.
Krupa Sagar Patil, learned counsel for the appellant
stated that sole respondent in this case is died, when
regular appeal itself is pending.
02. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo in this regard. The said memo is taken on record.
03. It is seen that the suit was filed by the
plaintiff before the Trial Court was only for injunction
which was dismissed. It is evident that against that
judgment, the regular appeal was preferred and the
same is also dismissed.
04. In view of the death of the respondent long
back and the nature of the suit is only for injunction,
the appeal stands dismissed as no cause of action
survives.
The appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE KJJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!