Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 866 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2021
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE M. G. UMA
M.F.A. No.7022 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHRIVIDYA K. S.
W/O DILIP H. R.
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/A No.432, HOSPITAL STREET,
OLD SBM BUILDING
KONANUR - 573130
ARKALGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT
PRESENTLY R/AT:
No.550, 2ND FLOOR, NEHARU ROAD,
KAMMANAHALLI, KALYANA NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560084 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. DILIP H. R.
S/O DR. RAMESH H. P.
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT No.119, 3RD MAIN ROAD, T.K.LAYOUT
MYSURU - 570009 .. RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS
ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.04.2019
PASSED IN M.C.NO.169/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VI
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU
PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S 13(1)(ia) OF
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
-: 2 :-
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
It is noted that Sriyuths T.Seshagiri and Sunil S Rao,
counsel, have filed Vakalathnama on behalf of the
appellant wherein no objection has been mentioned by the
previous counsel.
In view of the same, office to henceforth show the
name of Sri T.Seshagiri as counsel for the appellant and
delete the name of Sri.G.Balakrishna Shastry, counsel,
from the cause list.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo stating that the appellant is not inclined to
prosecute the appeal any further and hence, the appeal
may be dismissed as not pressed.
Memo is taken on record and perused.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Consequently,
I.A.1/2019 is also dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE rs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!