Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Shrividya K S vs Sri Dilip H R
2021 Latest Caselaw 866 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 866 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Smt Shrividya K S vs Sri Dilip H R on 13 January, 2021
Author: B.V.Nagarathna And Uma
                        -: 1 :-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

                       PRESENT

       THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

                                  AND

          THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE M. G. UMA

               M.F.A. No.7022 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. SHRIVIDYA K. S.
W/O DILIP H. R.
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/A No.432, HOSPITAL STREET,
OLD SBM BUILDING
KONANUR - 573130
ARKALGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT

PRESENTLY R/AT:
No.550, 2ND FLOOR, NEHARU ROAD,
KAMMANAHALLI, KALYANA NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560084                     ... APPELLANT

(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. DILIP H. R.
S/O DR. RAMESH H. P.
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT No.119, 3RD MAIN ROAD, T.K.LAYOUT
MYSURU - 570009                       .. RESPONDENT

      THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS
ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.04.2019
PASSED IN M.C.NO.169/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VI
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU
PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S 13(1)(ia) OF
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
                            -: 2 :-

   THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                       JUDGMENT

It is noted that Sriyuths T.Seshagiri and Sunil S Rao,

counsel, have filed Vakalathnama on behalf of the

appellant wherein no objection has been mentioned by the

previous counsel.

In view of the same, office to henceforth show the

name of Sri T.Seshagiri as counsel for the appellant and

delete the name of Sri.G.Balakrishna Shastry, counsel,

from the cause list.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a

memo stating that the appellant is not inclined to

prosecute the appeal any further and hence, the appeal

may be dismissed as not pressed.

Memo is taken on record and perused.

The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Consequently,

I.A.1/2019 is also dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE rs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter