Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 521 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
MFA NO.2711 OF 2018 (MV)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SHULAIKA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
W/O LATE HUSSAIN
2. BABY NID ARMIYA
AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS
D/O LATE HUSSAIN, MINOR
REP. BY HER MOTHER/NATURAL
GUARDIAN, SMT. SHULAIKA
BOTH ARE R/AT 54, 1ST BLOCK
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS NEAR CAUVERAMMA
TEMPLE ROAD, BYLASANDRA
BANGALORE
3. SMT. NEBIS
W/O LATE MOHAMMED
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/AT JONIGERE BEEDI
NEAR SIYA MASZID
PERIYAPATNA TOWN
MYSORE DISTRICT ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SYED ABDUL SABOOR, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
1. SMT. LEELADEVI
W/O SRI. MADANLAL SIRUI
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT 1582/3582 NEW COLONY
HUNSUR TOWN - 571 105
MYSURU DISTRICT
2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
KRISHNAMURTHYPURAM BRANCH
OFFICE, REP. BY ITS MANAGER
KRISHNAMURTHYPURAM
MYSURU - 570 004
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJANNA, ADV. FOR R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 23.12.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.703/2016 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRL.JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AS PRESIDING
OFFICER, MACT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
M.I.ARUN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 23.12.2017
passed by the Principal Judge, Small Causes & Senior Civil Judge
at at Mysuru, (for short 'the Tribunal') in MVC No.703/2016, the
petitioners therein have preferred this appeal.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred
to as per their ranking before the Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 19.04.2016 at
about 1.15 p.m. near Ambedkar Nagara on H.D.Kote - Hunsur
main road, when the deceased was proceeding on a motor cycle
bearing Reg. No.KA-02-HJ-53, a motor cycle bearing No.KA-45-
U-2894 being driven in a rash and negligent manner dashed
against the motor cycle of the deceased because of which
deceased fell down and sustained injuries and died on the spot
itself. Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the deceased, petitioner No.2
is the minor daughter of the deceased and petitioner No.3 is the
mother of the deceased.
4. Respondent No.1 is the owner of the offending motor
cycle and respondent No.2 is the insurance company which
whom the motor cycle is duly insured. Petitioners preferred
M.V.C.No.703/2016 and sought compensation of Rs.41,50,000/-.
5. After service of summons, respondent Nos.1 and 2 have
appeared before the Tribunal through their respective counsel
and filed their statement of objections, denied liability and
prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.
6. The petitioner No.1 got herself examined as PW-1 and
got marked Ex.P.1 to P.12. Respondents did not examine any
witness nor got marked any documents.
7. Based on the pleadings and evidence let in, the Tribunal
granted compensation of Rs.11,28,000/-. Not satisfied by the
same, the petitioners therein have preferred this appeal.
8. The petitioners have claimed the income of the
deceased as Rs.20,000/- per month. However, they have failed
to produce any evidence. Hence, the Tribunal has notionally
fixed income of the deceased at Rs.9,000/- per month. The
accident is of the year 2016. As per the chart prepared by the
Karnataka State Legal Services Authority in consultation with the
Insurance Company, the notional income in the absence of proof
of income to be adopted for the year 2016 is Rs.9,500/- per
month. Further, 40% has to be added to the income of the
deceased towards future prospects as per the law down by the
Apex Court in National Insurance Co.Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi
(2017) 16 SCC 680. The age of the deceased is about 41
years. Thus, multiplier of '14' is to be adopted. There being
three dependants, 1/3 has to be deducted towards his personal
expenses. Thus, on the count of loss of dependency, the
petitioners are entitled to a sum of Rs.13,30,000/- (9,500 +
25% x 12 x 14 x 1/3).
9. Further, as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in New India Assurance Co.Ltd. v. Somwati
[(2020)9 SCC 644], petitioners are entitled to a sum of
Rs.40,000/- each under the head loss of consortium and
Rs.30,000/- towards funeral expenses and loss of estate. Thus,
in all they are entitled to a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- under all
conventional heads. Thus, they are entitled to total
compensation of Rs.14,80,000/- as against Rs.11,28,000/-
awarded by the Tribunal.
10. Hence, the following:
ORDER
i] Appeal is allowed in part.
ii] The total compensation awarded by the Tribunal is modified and enhanced to Rs.14,80,000/- (Rupees Fourteen Lakhs Eighty Thousand only) as against Rs.11,28,000/- which shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the enhanced compensation from the date of the claim petition till its realization.
iii] The insurance company shall deposit the re-assessed total compensation determined as aforesaid before the Tribunal within 90 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the judgment and order.
iv] The portion of the order of the Tribunal inasmuch as liability, apportionment and disbursement remains intact.
v] The modified compensation shall be disbursed in terms of the order of the Tribunal.
vi] Draw modified award accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
MH/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!