Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 162 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
W.A.No.3770/2019 c/w W.A.No.3771/2019 (T -RES)
BETWEEN:
MFAR Developers Private Limited.,
Having office at: 3, Lavelle Road,
St.Marks Road, Bangalore - 560 001.
Through Mr. R.N.Nagaraja Gupta,
Chief Financial Officer.
... Appellant
(Common)
(By Sri. J.K.Mittal, Advocate for Sri. Vikram Unni
Rajagopal, Advocate (VC))
AND:
1. The Union Of India,
Through its Secretary,
Department of Revenue,
Ministry of Finance,
North Block, New Delhi - 110 011.
2. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax,
The Office of the Commissioner of Central Tax,
Audit-II Commissionerate,
2
JSS Tower, 100 Feet Ring Road,
Banashankari IIIrd Stage,
Bengaluru - 560 085.
3. The Commissioner of Central Tax (AUDIT)
Audit - II Commissionerate
JSS Tower, 100 Feet Ring Road,
Banashankari IIIrd Stage,
Bengaluru - 560 085.
4. The Principal Commissioner Service Tax-I
Commissionerate
Traffic & Transit Management Centre,
BMTC Building, 4th Floor,
Above BMTC Bus Stand, Domlur,
Bengaluru - 560 071.
5. The Commissioner of central Tax
Bengaluru - North Commissionerate,
HMT Bhawan, Ganga Nagar,
Bengaluru - 560 032. ... Respondents
(Common)
(By Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Advocate for R-2 to R-5,
R-1 Served )
W.A.No.3770/2019 is filed under Section 4 of the
Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order
dated 04/04/2019 passed by the learned Single Judge on
IA No.2/2019 in WP.No.9566/2019 (T-RES) and
consequently dismiss IA.No.2/2019 in WP
No.9566/2019.
W .A.No.3771/2019 is filed under Section 4 of the
Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order
dated 28/08/2019 passed by the learned Single Judge on
IA No.3/2019 in WP.No.9566/2019 (T-RES) and
3
consequently dismiss IA.No.3/2019 in WP No.9566/2019
[T-RES].
These appeals coming on for Preliminary Hearing
this day, NAGARATHNA, J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Sri Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned counsel appearing
for respondents 2 to 5 submits that the writ petition is
listed for final hearing and therefore, pendency of writ
appeals and the interim order passed in these appeals
may not come in the way of expeditious disposal of the
writ petition.
2. By way of response, learned counsel for appellant
submits that the interim order granted in these appeals
may be continued till the disposal of the writ petition and
the appeals may be accordingly disposed.
3. We find force in the contentions of learned counsel
on both sides. In the circumstances, we dispose these
appeals by extending the interim order granted by this
Court on 22.10.2020 in these appeals till the disposal of
the writ petition.
4. It is needless to observe that on account of
aforesaid direction, appellant shall not procrastinate the
matter before the learned Single Judge.
5. Both parties are directed to co-operate with the
learned Single Judge for expeditious disposal of the writ
petition which is stated to be taken up for final hearing
shortly.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!