State Of Karnataka vs Javaregowda
2021 Latest Caselaw 1059 Kant

                               1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

        DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021

                         PRESENT

         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

                            AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY

               M.F.A. NO.7665 OF 2019 (LAC)
BETWEEN:

1.     STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP
       BY SPECIAL LAND
       ACQUISITION OFFICER AND
       ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
       HASSAN-573201.

2.     EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
       P.W.D. HASSAN-573201.

3.     KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT
       CORPORATION LIMITED
       PRESENTLY AT
       SAMPARKA SOUDHA, NO.8
       BEP PREMISES, OPPOSITE ORION MALL
       DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD
       BANGALORE-576010
       REP. BY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
       MR. R. MANJUNATH.
                                              ... APPELLANTS

(BY MR. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, AAG A/W
    MR. AJAY J. NANDALIKE A.V. ADV.,)
                                    2



AND:

JAVAREGOWDA
S/O THIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/O MARAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI
HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT.
                                                      ... RESPONDENT
(BY MR. M.N. MADHUSUDHAN, ADV.,)

                                  ---

       THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LAND

ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.09.2016

PASSED    IN    LAC     NO.138/2016,    ON    THE   FILE   OF   THE   II

ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN, PARTLY

ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION

18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT.



       THIS    M.F.A.    COMING   ON    FOR    ORDERS,     THIS   DAY,

ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                             JUDGMENT

Mr.Dhyan Chinnappa, learned Additional Advocate

General along with Mr.Ajay J. Nandalike, learned counsel

for the appellant.

Mr. MN Madhusudhan, learned counsel for the

respondent.

For the reasons assigned by us in the judgment

passed today in M.F.A.No.6390/2019, this appeal stands

disposed of in same terms and with similar directions.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

ss