The Mysore Lamp Works Limited vs The State Of Karnataka
2021 Latest Caselaw 1565 Kant

                             1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021

                         PRESENT

         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

                           AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY

             W.A. NO.1399 OF 2011 (L-RES)
                          IN
             W.P. NO.37142 OF 2002 (L-RES)

BETWEEN:

THE MYSORE LAMP WORKS LIMITED
REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
OLD TUMKUR ROAD
MALLESHWARAM WEST
BANGALORE-560055
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
MR. ANIL UPPIN.
                                                ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. UDAYA HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR
   SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADV.,)

AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT.
       DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR
       M.S. BUILDINGS, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
       BANGALORE-560001.

2.     WORKMEN OF MYSORE LAMP WORKS LIMITED
       REPRESENTED BY THE MYSORE LAMP
       STAFF & EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD.)
       (A REGISTERED TRADE UNION
       UNDER THE INDIAN TRADE UNIONS ACT)
                             2



     REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT
     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT OLD
     TUMKUR ROAD, MALLESHWARAM WEST
     BANGALORE-560055.

3.   THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR
     IN KARNATAKA
     BANNERGHATTA ROAD
     BANGALORE.
                                             ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, AAG, FOR R1 & R3
    SRI. K. SUBBA RAO, SR. COUNSEL FOR
    SRI. SATHISHA K.N., ADV., FOR C/R2)

                             ---
      THIS W.A. IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ACT, PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT
PETITION NO.37142/2002 DATE 14.01.2011.

      THIS W.A. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON
08.02.2021  FOR    HEARING  AND   COMING   ON   FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J.,
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                       JUDGMENT

For the reasons assigned by us in the judgment

passed today in W.A.No.16925/2011, this appeal also

stands disposed of on the same terms and with similar

directions.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE SS