Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1561 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
O.S.A. NO.36 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
WORKMEN OF MYSORE LAMP WORKS LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY MYSORE LAMP WORKS
STAFF & EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD.),
(A REGISTERED TRADE UNION REGISTERED UNDER
THE INDIAN TRADE UNIONS ACT),
REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT OLD TUMKUR ROAD,
MALLESWARAM WEST, BANGALORE-560 055.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. K. SUBBA RAO, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. K.N. SATHEESHA, ADV.,)
AND:
1. BOARD FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL
RECONSTRUCTION, NEW DELHI
REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE
VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2
3. MYSORE LAMP WORKS LTD.,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
PB NO. 5551, MALLESWARAM WEST
BANGALORE-560 055.
4. M/S. MYSORE MINERALS LTD.,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
TTMC, 'A' BLOCK, 5TH FLORR
BMTC BUILDING, K.H. ROAD
SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, AAG FOR R2
SRI. UDAYA HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADV., FOR R3
SRI. K. KASTURI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. SAJI P. JOHN, ADV AND
SRI. B. RAJASHREE, ADV., FOR IMPLEADING
APPLICANT ON IA 1/16 & IA 2/20
R1 SERVED
SRI. V. BALAKRISHNA, ADV., FOR
IMPLEADING APPLICANT IN IA 1/2020)
---
THIS O.S.A. IS FILED U/S 483 OF THE COMPANIES ACT,
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
28.07.2014 MADE IN COMPANY PETITION NO.231/2000 AND
ACCEPT THE PROPOSALS OF THE GOVERNMENT AND DIRECT THE
COMPANY COURT TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSALS OF THE
GOVERNMENT AND GRANT APPROVAL FOR REVIVAL OF THE
COMPANY AND ETC.
THIS O.S.A. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON
08.02.2021 FOR HEARING AND COMING ON FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J.,
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
This Original Side Appeal in Company Petition No.
231/2000 has been filed by the workmen of Mysore
Lamp Works Ltd., in which the appellant has assailed
the validity of the order dated 28.07.2014 passed by
learned Single Judge in Company Petition No.231/2000
by which the learned Single Judge has allowed the
petition for winding up of M/s Mysore Lamp Works Ltd.
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Company' for short) and
has appointed Official Liquidator has Liquidator of the
company.
2. Facts leading to filing of this appeal briefly
stated are that the Company filed an application before
the Board of Industrial and Finance Reconstruction
under Section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies
(Special Provisions) Act, 1985. The Board of Industrial
and Finance Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as
'the BIFR' for short) passed an order on 18.07.2000
directing that Mysore Lamp Works Ltd. be wound up.
The order passed by the BIFR was challenged by the
Company before the Appellate Authority For Industrial
And Finance Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as
'the Appellate Authority' for short). The Appellate
Authority by an order dated 18.07.2001 dismissed the
appeal preferred by the company. The Company
thereafter, made an application before Appellate
Authority for review of its order, but the application for
review was rejected by the Appellate Authority. The
Company thereafter, challenged the orders of winding
up before this court in Company petition viz.,
CoP.No.231/2000. The appellant made an application for
impleading as additional respondent in Company
Petition, which was allowed and the appellant filed a
detailed statement of objections to the company
petition. The company petition was decided by the
learned Company Judge by an order dated 28.07.2014.
The learned Company Judge inter alia held that the
Company cannot be possibly revived and being a sick
industrial company, it is just and equitable to wind up
the company. The company petition was allowed and
the company was directed to be wound up. The Official
Liquidator was appointed as Liquidator of the company.
In the aforesaid factual background, this appeal has
been filed.
3. During the pendency of this appeal, the
Government of Karnataka has taken a conscious
decision by an order dated 01.12.2020, which reads as
under:
GOVERNMENT ORDER NO:CI 108 CMI 2020 (E), BENGALURU, DATED 01.12.2020
In the circumstances explained in the preamble, Government is pleased to accord approval for utilization of land assets of M/s Mysore Lamp Works Ltd. (MLWL) for Experience Bengaluru Project as below:
(i) To develop Experience Bengaluru Project on the land assets of MLQWL as a novel concept showcasing both the culture of Karnataka but also maintaining lung space in the heart of the city as per the National Green Tribunal Act.
(ii) Withdrawal of Government Order dated 20.03.2020 according approval to the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Mysore Lamp Works Limited with Karnataka State Minerals Corporation Limited and empowering Mysore Lamp Works Limited to implement Experience Bengaluru Project by making necessary changes in the Memorandum of Association and Article of Association.
(iii) BDA to consider for change of land use from industrial to public and semi public of MLWL land to suit the proposed Experience Bengaluru Project.
(iv) In principal approval to initiate process of buy out minority shareholders of 5.6% and settle liabilities and make the MLWL to 100% Government Shareholding Company.
The above approval is accorded subject to the following terms and conditions:
(1) A detailed valuation of the company is to be done after the change in nature of the company and after the change in nature of ht eland. The value of each share is then assessed and shared with GoK.
(b) The liability with respect to employees will continue to be the responsibility of the KSMCL as decided in the previous amalgamation order.
(c) MLWL board decision is taken as mandated by the companies act wherever necessary.
(d) Hon'ble High Court is briefed of the new developments before hand since a case is still pending in the court with respect to employees issue.
(e) Since majority of the employees are already absorbed in KSMCL, they will continue to work there and employees' issues with respect to fitment, payment of arrears, etc will be handled by KSMCL.
(f) On the liabilities (primarily Government debts and some dues towards Government companies etc.) - since MLW will continue to be in existence, the liabilities need not be retired as of now. A decision on this can be taken at a later date.
This order is issued with the concurrence of Finance Dept. vide its Note No. FD 320 Exp-1/2020 dated 25.11.2020; Commerce and Industries Department (Mines) vide File No. CI 108 CMI 2020 (P2) (E) dated 26.11.2020 & Urban Development Department vide File No .CI 108 CMI 2020 (P3) (E) and Cabinet approval in its meeting held on 27.11.2020 vide subject No.C:612/2020.
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka
Sd/-
Under Secretary (C &C) Commerce & Industries Department.
4. Thus, from perusal of the aforesaid
Government Order, it is evident that the Government
has taken a conscious decision to approve for utilization
of the land assets of the company for Experience
Bengaluru Project and has withdrawn the Government
Order dated 20.03.2020 according approval to the
scheme of amalgamation of Company with Karnataka
State Minerals Corporation Limited and empowering the
company to implement Experience Bengaluru Project by
making necessary changes in its Memorandum of
Association and Articles of Association. In-Principal
approval has also been accorded to initiate the process
of buy out minority shareholders of 5.6% and settle
liabilities and make the company to a 100%
Government Share Holding Company and the aforesaid
decisions have been taken subject to the terms and
conditions, which have been mentioned in the order. It
is pertinent to mention here that this O.S.A. was being
heard along with connected writ appeals in which order
granting permission to close the company, which was
upheld by the learned Single Judge is under challenge.
A bench of this court passed an interim order dated
08.12.2016, in which direction was given to make
payment of a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- each to the
workmen who are before us subject to verification and
the M/s Karnataka Minerals Corporation Ltd. was
directed to decide the issue with regard to absorption of
the employees. Thereafter, another order was passed by
a bench of this court on 13.11.2020 in this O.S.A. as
well as connected matters, in which direction was given
to make adhoc payment of Rs.15,000/- per employee
per month for last three years and the aforesaid amount
was directed toi be paid within a period of four weeks.
However, the payment was made subject to result of
the appeal and orders that would be passed on the
merger by the appropriate Government and also subject
to future adjustment that can be made. Needless to
state that it is trite law that life of an interim order is co
terminus with the main proceeding. Therefore, the
aforesaid interim orders do not survive after decision of
this appeal. However, the impact and effect of the
interim orders has been considered by us in connected
writ appeal viz., W.A.No.16925/2011.
In view of the conscious decision taken by the
State Government during the pendency of this appeal,
the order dated 28.07.2014 is hereby quashed and set
aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE ss
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!