Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6304 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.833 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
1. SHOBHA
W/O NAGARAJU
D/O BOREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT BORE ANANDUR
YELAVALA HOBLI
MYSOROE TALUK-573 204.
2. SHUBA
W/O RAMESHA
D/O BOREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT JARAGANAHALLI VILLAGE
SRINIVASA KALYANA MANTAPA
KANAKAPURA ROAD
BANGALORE-560 078.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI HANUMANTHAPPA B.HARAVI
GOWDAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1. VASANTHA
W/O BYREGOWDA
D/O RAMEGOWDA
AGED 32 YEARS.
2
2. MANJUNATHA @ MANJUNATH
RAMEGOWDA @ CHIKKARAMA
AGED 30 YEARS.
3. MADHU
S/O RAMEGOWDA @ CHIKKARAMA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.
4. VARALAKSHMI
D/O LOKESHA,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
5. NAGENDRA
S/O LOKESHA,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5
ARE R/AT HULIKERE VILLAGE,
BELAGOLA VILLAGE,
BELAGOLA HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK-577305.
6. BOREGOWDA
S/O LATE ANGADI SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
7. RAMEGOWDA @ CHIKKARAMA
S/O LATE ANGADI SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
8. NINGEGOWDA
S/O LATE ANGADI SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
9. RAJEGOWDA
S/O LATE ANGADI SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
10. BYREGOWDA
S/O LATE ANGADI SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3
11. LOKESHA
S/O LATE ANGADI SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
RESPONDENT NOS.6 T 11
ARE R/AT HULIKERE VILLAGE
BELAGOLA HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK.
12. DEVASSAI PUDUSSERY
S/O LATE PAUL PADUSSERY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT DE PAUL SEMINARY
AVARAHALLI VILALGE,
BELAGOLA HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA.
13. FA-VARGIS PADINTURE
VADAKEKAR,
S/O VARGI VIN SATIYAN,
R/AT DE-PAUL SEMINARY,
AVERAHALLI VILLAGE,
BELAGOLA HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA.
14. BORAMMA
W/O SINGEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT HULIKERE VILALGE,
BELAGOLA HOBLI,
SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96, CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
SRIRANGAPATNA IN O.S. NO.100/2008 DATED 17.1.2015
AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THIS APPEAL..
4
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
P.S. DINESH KUMAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellants even
when the matter is called for the second time. This appeal
is of the year 2015. Office objections are still not complied
with.
2. We find no grounds to grant further adjournment.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
vgh*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!