Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5587 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1282/2015
BETWEEN:
SMT.SHAMBHAVI A SHETTY
W/O ANANDA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
R/AT KAJIKARABETTU
NANDIKOOR VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT
PIN 576101.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. H JAYAKARA SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 SMT.APPI SHEDTHI
@ APPI B HEGDE
D/O THANU SHETTY @ SHESHI
SHEDTHI, W/O BHASKAR HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
2 SAROJAKSHA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
3 SMT.HASMATHI R SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
4 NAVEENCHANDRA HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
2
5 SUCHETHAN HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
6 JAYADEEP HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
- RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6 ARE
CHILDREN OF 1ST RESPONDENT
AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT
HEGDE NIVAS, PALIMAR VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK 574 112
7 DR.SHISHIRA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
8 AVADHESH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
- RESPONDENTS 7 & 8 ARE
CHILDRERN OF 3RD RESPONDENT
AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT
HEGDE NIVAS, PALIMAR VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK 574 112
ARAVINDA SHETTY (SINCE DEAD BY LRS)
9 SMT.PADMAVATHI SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
10 ARPITHA SHETTY,
AGED ABUT 24 YEARS
- RESPONDENT 9 IS WIFE AND
RESPONDENT 10 IS DAUGHTER OF
LATE ARAVINDA SHETTY AND ARE
PRESENTLY RESITING AT
RAGHAVENDRA NILAYA
CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU 560 012
3
11 PRATHVINDA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
12 VRINDA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
13 SANDYA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 11 TO 13 ARE
CHILDREN OF APPELLANT
SMT.SHAMBHAVI A SHETTY
AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT
KAJIKARABETTU, NANDIKOOR
VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK
AND DISTRICT 576 101
14 SMT. RAMANI RAGHU SHETTY
D/O THANU SHETTY & SHESHI SHEDTHI
W/O RAGHU SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
R/AT KAJIKARABETTU, NANDIKOOR
VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK
AND DISTRICT 576 101
... RESPONDENTS
(R-2 TO R-6 ARE L.RS OF DECEASED R-1;
R-9 TO R-14 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF
C.P.C. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED
15.04.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.41/2013 ON THE FILE OF
THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, UDUPI, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 30.03.2007 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.153/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, UDUPI.
4
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo for withdrawal of the appeal stating that the
parties have settled the matter out of the Court at the
intervention of the friends and well wishers. Hence,
memo dated 01.12.2021 for withdrawal is taken on
record.
2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
nms
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!