Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5417 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 December, 2021
RSA.1204/2010
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
R.S.A.No.1204/2010
BETWEEN:
1. H.Y.Shivakumar
S/o Yogappa,
Aged about 31 years,
2. Smt. Siddamma
W/o Yogappa,
Aged about 56 years,
3. Vimala
D/o Yogappa,
Aged about 34 years,
4. Vishala
D/o Yogappa,
Aged about 33 years,
5. Suma
D/o Yogappa,
Aged about 31 years,
All are R/o. Halebeedu Village,
Belur Taluk,
Hassan District-573121. ... APPELLANTS
(By Sri D.C.Jagadeesh, Adv.-Absent)
AND:
1. B.G.Nataraj,
Since deceased by his LRs.
RSA.1204/2010
2
1(a) Smt. H.C.Nandini
w/o Late B.G.Nataraj,
aged about 27 years,
1(b) B.N.Ganashree
D/o Late B.G.Nataraj,
aged about 10 years,
1(c) B.N.Eshwari
D/o Late B.G.Nataraj,
aged about 6 years,
R1(b) & R1(c) are minors &
Rep. by mother and N.G.,
R1(a).
All are R/o.No.491,
Shruthiyalam, 7th Cross,
7th main road, K.N.Extn.,
Yeshwanthapura,
Bangalore-560022.
2. B.G.Shivakumar
S/oB.M.Gangadhara,
Aged about 44 years,
3. B.G.Rajashekara,
S/o B.M.Gangadhara,
Aged about 43 years,
2 & 3 are R/o Halebeedu Village,
Belur Taluk, Hassan District-573121.
4. H.C.Yogappa
@ A.K.Gowda,
S/o Chikkegowda,
Aged about 62 years,
R/o Halebeedu Village,
Belur Taluk,
Hassan district-573121. ... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri Shankaraiah.B, Adv. for R1[A-C];
R1(B) & (C) are minors rep. by R1(A);
R2 to R4 - served)
RSA.1204/2010
3
This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of
CPC against the judgment and decree dated 25.02.2010 passed
in RA No.25/2008 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) &
JMFC., Belur, allowing the appeal and setting aside the
judgment and decree dt:22.03.2004 passed in OS.No.11/1993
on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) & JMFC., Belur.
This appeal coming on for Dismissal, this day, the Court
delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This Court on 26.10.2021 had finally granted a
week's time to the learned Counsel for the appellants to file
the paper book, failing which, the appeal was directed to
be listed for dismissal.
The matter is called twice. There is no representation
on behalf of the appellants.
Having regard to the order dated 26.10.2021 passed
by the co-ordinate bench of this Court, this Court has no
other option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!