Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3217 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
C.C.C. NO. 433 OF 2021 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
M/S ARYA KRISHNA MANSION
APARTMENT OWNER WELFARE
ASSOCIATION (REGD)
NO 38, CANARA BANK LAYOUT,
BESIDE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA,
VIRUPAKSHAPURA, VIDYARANYAPURA POST,
BENGALURU - 560097
REP. BY PAWANKUMAR JAYARAJ WODEYAR
S/O JAYARAJ K WODEYAR
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
SECRETARY F.NO. 112, NO. 38,
CANARA BANK LAYOUT, BESIDE
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
VIRUPAKSHAPURA,
VIDYARANYAPURA POST,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SHRI KAREDDY BASAWARAJ SIDDALINGAPPA,
ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY K, KAS.,
THE THASHILDAR
MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
YELAHANKA
BENGALURU 560064
2
2. JAGADEESH.K
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KODIGEHALLI POLICE STATION,
KODIGEHALLI,
BENGALURU 560092
... ACCUSED
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
ROOM NO.505, 5TH FLOOR
M.S.BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001
... PRO FORMA RESPONDENT NO.3
(VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 01.07.2021)
(BY SHRI KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP FOR A-1,
A-2 AND PRO FORMA RESPONDENT)
---
THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12
OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE
215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, BY THE
COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE
COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE SUMMONS TO THE
ACCUSED PERSONS AND THEY MAY BE BROUGHT
BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT, TRIED AND PUNISHED
FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER CIVIL
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 COMMITTED BY THEM,
FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF HON'BLE
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DATED 25.03.2021 IN
W.P.NO.1285/2021 (GM-RES).
THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH
VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
The learned Additional Government Advocate has
produced for our perusal an order passed on 22nd July,
2021 in W.A. No.517 of 2021. He states that the said
appeal has been preferred for challenging the judgment
and order of which breach is alleged in this petition. He
pointed out that the judgment and order of which breach is
alleged has been stayed in the said appeal till 21st
September, 2021.
2. In view of the stay granted by the appeal Bench, we
dispose of this contempt petition. In the event the order of
stay is vacated and the order of which breach is alleged is
not complied, we permit the complainant to apply for revival
of this contempt petition.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
vgh*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!