Md. Jainul Aawedin Ansari @ Md. Zainul ... vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 2208 Jhar

Jharkhand High Court

Md. Jainul Aawedin Ansari @ Md. Zainul ... vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 20 March, 2026

Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

                                 ( 2026:JHHC:7783 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
              B.A. No. 2218 of 2026
                       ------

Md. Jainul Aawedin Ansari @ Md. Zainul Abeddin Ansari, aged about 38 years, s/o Md. Mukhtar Ansari, r/o Village- Gahira, Murgabani, P.O. & P.S.-Govindpur, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl. P.P.

------

Order No.02 Dated- 20.03.2026

Heard the parties.

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.266 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 316(2)/ 318(2)/ 338/ 336(3)/ 340(2)/ 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons obtained a loan from State Bank of India by submitting forged documents claiming to be government employees. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has repaid the loan amount to the bank and the State Bank of India has issued a No Dues Certificate, a copy of which has been kept at Annexure-2 at page no.16 of the brief. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.17 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 05 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-XIII, Ranchi, in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.266 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 20.03.2026 Gunjan-