Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Martin Soy Aged About 29 Years Son Of Sri ... vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1432 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1432 Jhar
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Martin Soy Aged About 29 Years Son Of Sri ... vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ... on 20 February, 2026

Author: Rajesh Kumar
Bench: Rajesh Kumar
                                                                                    2026:JHHC:5136


                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                    B. A. No. 11869 of 2025
                                           ....

Martin Soy aged about 29 years son of Sri Navin Soy, resident of village-Jombro, P.O. Dalbhanga, P.S. Kuchai, District-Seraikella at Kharsawan .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ....

              CORAM:          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

              For the Petitioner             : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv.
              For the State                  : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P.
                                             ....
              03/20.02.2026

1. The applicant who is in custody since 14.10.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Kuchai (Dalbhanga O.P.) P.S. Case No.35 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 15(C)/ 22(C) of the NDPS Act, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella-Kharsawan.

2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.

3. Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that commercial quantity of narcotics i.e 471.51 Kgs doda has been recovered from the vehicle parked in the house of the co-accused, namely, Juwan Purty. Juwan Purty has confessed that he alongwith this applicant has used to do business of doda. It has been further submitted that the charge has already been framed. On the above basis prayer for bail has been made.

4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.

5. Considering the fact that commercial quantity of narcotics has been recovered and there is enough material to suggest that there is involvement of the applicant in the alleged crime, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 20.02.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 21.02.2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter