Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Uday Kumar Mehta vs The State Of Jharkhand
2026 Latest Caselaw 1183 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1183 Jhar
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Uday Kumar Mehta vs The State Of Jharkhand on 16 February, 2026

Author: Deepak Roshan
Bench: Deepak Roshan
                                           2026:JHHC:4528


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                   W.P.(C) No. 726 of 2022
                                  --

1. Uday Kumar Mehta, Aged about 42 Years, Son of Sitaram Mehta, Resident of village-Saratu, P.O.-Saratu, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

2. Vijay Kumar Mehta, Aged about 44 Years, Son of Bishwanath Mehta, Resident of village-Tandwa, P.O.-Tandwa, P.S.- Tandwa, Dist-Aurangabad, Bihar.

3. Vinit Kumar Garg, Aged about 32 Years, Son of Vijay Agrawal, Resident of village-Purhara, P.O.-Tandwa, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

4. Ajay Kumar Agrawal, Aged about 50 Years, Son of Vishwanath Prasad, Resident of village-Tandwa, P.O.-Tandwa, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist-Aurangabad, Bihar.

5. Birbal Rajak, Aged about 47 Years, Son of Sikhari Rajak, Resident of village-Kutumba, P.O.-Kutumba, P.S.-Kutumba, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

6. Sanjay Kumar Mehta, Aged about 44 Years, Son of Bishwanath Mahato, Resident of village-Dudhar, P.O.- Dudhar, P.S.-Dudhar, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

7. Banshraj Kumar, Aged about 57 Years, Son of Prahalad Mahto, Resident of village-GH-42 Gayatri Nagar Site-4 Sector- 2, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi Jharkhand.

8. Indresh Prasad Mehta, Aged about 48 Years, Son of Fudeni Prasad Mehta, Resident of village-Kauwa Khoh, P.O.-Kurhat Kaltaiya, P.S.-Hariharganj, Dist- Palamu, Jharkhand.

9. Rajesh Kumar Mehta, Aged about 38 Years, Son of Ambika Mahato, Resident of village-Kauwakhoh, P.O.-Kurhat Kaltaiya, P.S.-Hariharganj, Dist- Palamu, Jharkhand

10. Parmeshwar Kumar, Aged about 42 Years, Son of Janki Mahato, Resident of village-Kauwakhoh, P.O.-Kataiya, P.S.- Hariharganj, Dist-Palamu, Jharkhand.

11. Md Tabrez Alam, Aged about 32 Years, Son of Md Shamim Akhtar, Resident of village- Khajuri Tika, P.O.- Khajuri Tika Khajuri Tika, P.S.-Tandwa Khajuri Tika, Dist-Aurangabad, Bihar.

12. Tetar Devi, Aged about 45 Years, Wife of Ramswarup Prajapati, Resident of village-Khajuri Tika, P.O.-Khajuri Tika, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

13. Jagdish Prajapat, Aged about 52 Years, Son of Nagdev Prajapat, Resident of village-Khajuri Tika, P.O.-Khajuri Tika , P.S.-Tandwa Khajuri Tika, Dist-Aurangabad, Bihar.

14. Krishna Ram, Aged about 42 Years, Son of Awadhesh Ram, Resident of village-Uchaila, P.O.-Rohtas, P.S.-Rohtas, Dist- Rohtas, Bihar.

15. Nagendra Yadav, Aged about 39 Years, Son of Ramchandra yadav, Resident of village-Shankarpur, P.O.-Nabinagar, P.S.- Nabinagar, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

2026:JHHC:4528

16. Ramasheesh Kumar, Aged about 35 Years, Son of Sita ram Mehta, Resident of village-Saratu, P.O.-Saratu, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

17. Umesh Kumar Verma, Aged about 37 Years, Son of Ramvilash Verma, Resident of village-Kauakhoh, P.O.-Kataia, P.S.-Hariharganj, Dist-Palamu, Jharkhand

18. Premshila Kumari, Aged about 29 Years, Wife of Saroj Kumar, Resident of village-Kauwakhoh, P.O.-Harihargaj, P.S.- Hariharganj, Dist-Palamu, Jharkhand.

19. Shankar Prasad Mehta, Aged about 51 Years, Son of Matukdhari Mehta, Resident of village-Kauwakhoih, P.O.- Hariharganj, P.S.-Hariharganj, Dist- Palamau, Jharkhand.

20. Vinay Kumar, aged about 39 years, son of Kamdev Mehta, resident of Village-Kolhuwara, P.O.-Hariharganj, P.S.- Hariharganj, Dist- Palamau, Jharkhand.

21. Sunil Kumar, aged about 44 years, son of Ambika Mehta, Village-Kolhuwara, P.O.-Hariharganj, P.S.-Hariharganj, Dist- Palamau, Jharkhand.

22. Mithilesh Mehta, aged about 37 years, son of Late Raghunandan Mehta, Village-Kolhuwara, P.O.-Hariharganj, P.S.-Hariharganj, Dist- Palamau, Jharkhand.

23. Sudama Mahto, Aged about 55 Years, Son of Thakur Mahto, Resident of village-Saratu, P.O.-Saratu, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

24. Nagdev Pal, aged about 47 years, son of Shiv Nandan Bhagat, resident of village-Dayadih, P.O-Pandu, P.S-Tandwa, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar.

.....Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Government of Jharkhand At Ranchi, Jharkhand Mantralaya, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi, P.O and P.S - Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, 834003

3. The Union of India through The Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Department of Agriculture and cooperative, Ministry of Agriculture Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, P.O.-New Delhi, P.S.-New Delhi, District-New Delhi, 110001

4. The Home Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi, P.O and P.S-Dhurwa, District Ranchi, 834003.

5. The Director General Police, Jharkhand Police Head Quarter, P.O- Dhurwa, P.S-Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 834003.

6. M/S Rainbow Multi State Credit Cooperative Society limited through Chief Promoter cum Chairman, Resident of Balaji Majestic, Mithu Road, P.O and P.S-Bank More, Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand) 826001

7. The Deputy Commissioner Palamu at Medininagar, P.O and P.S -Medininagar, District - Palamu, Jharkhand, 822101

8. The Superintendent of Police, Palamu, P.O and P.S - Medininagar (Daltonganj), Jharkhamd, 822101.

2026:JHHC:4528

9. The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad, P.O and P.S- Aurangabad, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar 824101

10. The Deputy Commissioner Aurangabad, P.O and P.S- Aurangabad, Dist- Aurangabad, Bihar 824101.

...Respondents

---

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

--

                For the Petitioner(s)    : M/s. Mukesh Kumar Mehta, Prem
                                         Mardi, Advocates
                For the Respondents      : A.C to AAG-III
                                         --
07/16.02.2026               Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

the defect as pointed out by the Registry may be ignored. Accordingly, the same is ignored.

2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to take appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.

3. There is no objection from the respondents.

4. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty, as prayed for.

(Deepak Roshan, J.)

16th February, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 19/02/2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter