Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5960 Jhar
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025
2025:JHHC:28849
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024
----
Juvenile 'X' through his father .... Petitioner
-- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Advocate
----
04/18.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. This criminal revision has been preferred against the order
dated 15.10.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No.2808 of
2024 arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No.122 of 2024 by the learned
Additional Judicial Commissioner-IV-cum-Special Judge, POCSO,
Ranchi registered under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code, Section 6
of POCSO Act and Section 67(A) of Information Technology Act
arising out of Children Case No.07 of 2024 pending in the Court of
learned Additional Judicial Commissioner - IV-cum-Special Judge,
POCSO, Ranchi by which the bail application filed by the petitioner
has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is juvenile aged about 17 years at the time of alleged
occurrence and he is being represented by his father and he is
--1--
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024 2025:JHHC:28849
ready to give any undertaking. He further submits that the
petitioner is in remand home since 04.06.2024. He then submits
that in the social investigation report it has come that if the
petitioner is allowed to remain in custody for longer period that may
adversely affect the petitioner and further in the social investigation
report it has come that out of love the same act has been done by
the petitioner. He next submits that in the medical report there is
nothing against the petitioner. He submits that the learned Court
has been pleased to dismiss the petition only on the ground that
there is chance of associating the petitioner with any known
criminals and from exposing him to moral, physical or psychological
danger.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer
and submits that the allegations are there and the learned Court
has rightly rejected the bail application.
5. In view of above submission of learned counsel appearing
for the parties, it is an admitted position that the petitioner is
juvenile aged about 17 years at the time of alleged occurrence and
he is in remand home since 04.06.2024 and it has come in the
social investigation report that if the petitioner will be allowed to
remain in custody for longer period that may adversely affect the
petitioner and the petitioner is being represented by his father and
he is ready to give any undertaking.
--2--
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024 2025:JHHC:28849
6. Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Act, 2015, deals with bail to juveniles. On perusal of
Section 12 of the J.J. Act, 2015, it is crystal clear that that Section
12 of the Act overrides the bail provisions as contained in the
Criminal Procedure, 1973 or any other law for time being in force. It
is further crystal clear that bail to the juvenile is a rule and refusal
of the same is an exception and juvenile can be denied bail only on
the following three grounds :
(i) if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring that person into association with any known criminal, or
(ii) expose the said person to moral, physical or psychological danger, or
(iii) the person's release would defeat the ends of justice.
7. In light of Section 12 of the said Act, it also transpires that
seriousness of the alleged offence or the age of the juvenile are also
no relevant consideration for denial of bail above 16 years of age
and is alleged to have committed a heinous offence is also entitled
to get bail under Section 12 of the Act, 2015 with regard to grant of
bail. Section 12 of the Act is applicable to all juveniles in conflict
with law without any discrimination of any nature.
8. The learned Court has been pleased to reject the bail
application only on the ground that the petitioner will expose to
moral, physical or psychological danger that does not found to be
good reason.
--3--
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024 2025:JHHC:28849
9. The gravity of allegation has not been properly appreciated
and mandatory provision of Section 12 of Juvenile Justice Act as
well as other provisions relating to the juvenile has declined to grant
bail to the juvenile on the basis of unfounded apprehension is not
the spirit of Juvenile Justice Act. In the absence of any materials or
evidences of reasonable grounds, it cannot be said that his release
would defeat the ends of justice and the learned Court has failed to
give reasons on three contingencies for declining the bail to the
revisionist.
10. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the order dated
15.10.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No.2808 of 2024
arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No.122 of 2024 by the learned
Additional Judicial Commissioner-IV-cum-Special Judge, POCSO,
Ranchi is not sustainable in the eye of law, hence the order is
hereby set aside and the present criminal revision is allowed.
11. Let the revisionist who is in observation home since
04.06.2024 be released on bail via assurance and surety given by
his natural guardian/father, in connection with Misc. Criminal
Application No.2808 of 2024 arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No.122
of 2024, registered under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code, Section
6 of POCSO Act and Section 67(A) of Information Technology Act
after furnishing a personal bond on his father (Krishna Kumar
Sharma) with two sureties of his relatives each in the like amount to
--4--
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024 2025:JHHC:28849
the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-IV-cum-
Special Judge, POCSO, Ranchi, subject to the following conditions:
(i) Natural guardian/father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.
(ii) Natural guardian/father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.
(iii) Juvenile and natural guardian/father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month commencing with the first Monday of September, 2025, and if during any calendar month the first Monday falls on a holiday, then on the following working day.
(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board, Ranchi, on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.
12. Before imparting the judgment, it is necessary to point out
that the identity of the juvenile in the present matter has been
disclosed in the impugned judgment and order which violates the
right to privacy and confidentiality of the juvenile and against the
law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shilpa
Mittal v. NCT Delhi, reported in (2020) 2 SCC 787 wherein it
was held that the identity of the juvenile shall not be disclosed.
--5--
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024 2025:JHHC:28849
13. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist through
his natural guardian/father. The memo of parties discloses the name
of the juvenile.
14. The Registry is directed to conceal the names of the juvenile
from the cause list as well as the record of this case, so that the
names and identities are not disclosed as directed by Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Shilpa Mittal (supra).
15. This criminal revision petition is allowed and disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated 18.09.2025 Sangam/
--6--
Criminal Revision No. 1250 of 2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!