Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mayank Bothra vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 6273 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6273 Jhar
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Mayank Bothra vs The State Of Jharkhand on 7 October, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
                                                                           2025:JHHC:31007




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                              Criminal Revision No. 958 of 2025
             Mayank Bothra, aged about 38 years, son of late Ganesh Prasad Bothra,
             resident of 11/3/1 Kali Prasad Chakraborty Lane, Sreerupa Cinema Hall, P.O.,
             P.S. & District-Howrah, West Bengal.              ... Petitioner
                                         -Versus-
            1. The State of Jharkhand
            2. Ashish Kumar Gupta, son of Chhotelal Gupta, resident of House No. 336,
              Ward No. 12, Goushala, Nala Road, Kachahari Mohalla, Jugsalai, P.O. and
              P.S.- Jugsalai, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand)
                                                          ... Opposite Parties
                                            -----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

-----

            For the Petitioner        : Mr. Shivam Kumar, Advocate
                                        Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Advocate, through V.C.
            For the State             : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
            For the O.P. No.2         : Mr. Rohit Sinha, Advocate
                                            -----
05/07.10.2025      Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel

            appearing for State and O.P. No.2.

2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred against the order

dated 07.05.2025 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur,

whereby the discharge petition has been rejected, filed vide Mis. Cri.

Application No. 4996/2024 in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No. 51 of

2022 dated 08.03.2022 (corresponding to G.R. No. 136 of 2023) registered

for the alleged commission of offences u/s 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B,

34 IPC, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned

Court has not considered entire aspects of the matter and rejected the

discharge petition filed by the petitioner and in view of that, this petition has

been preferred.

4. On query by the Court why this petition has been straight way filed

before the High Court without moving before the learned Sessions Judge,

2025:JHHC:31007

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that concurrent

jurisdiction is there of both the Courts and in view of that, this petition has

been preferred directly before the High Court.

5. The scope and ambit of Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagrik

Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 are not only confined to the correctness or

legality of the order but also to its propriety. Both the Courts of Sessions and

Magistrate are inferior to the High Court and Courts of Judicial Magistrate are

inferior to the Court of Sessions Judge. When an order is passed by the

learned Sessions Judge, the only remedy left with the aggrieved party is to

approach the High Court under the BNSS to question correctness, legality or

propriety, but when the same is passed by a Magistrate, though power lies to

both the Sessions and the High Court, but as a matter of prudence and

propriety, it will be appropriate to first approach the first forum and except in

rare and special circumstances to the High Court. Such special circumstances

may be where the Sessions Judge has directly or indirectly participated in the

enquiry or investigation or trial or through his any action or order interest of

justice demands that High Court alone should interfere in the order of the

learned Magistrate.

6. This aspect of the matter has been elaborately decided by this Court

in Criminal Revision No.417 of 2023, vide judgment dated 11.09.2025.

7. In view of the above and since straightway this petition has been filed

before the High Court and what are the special circumstances of filing the

present petition before the High Court, are not disclosed in this petition and

in that view of the matter, this criminal revision petition is dismissed. I.A.

petition, if any also stands disposed of.

2025:JHHC:31007

8. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh revision petition before

the learned Sessions Judge and in that event the period taken during this

revision petition will not come in the way for the purpose of limitation. The

ground/plea taken by the petitioner herein, will be considered by the learned

Sessions Judge.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 7th October, 2025 R.Kumar/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter