Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brijlal Bedia And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner
2025 Latest Caselaw 2882 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2882 Jhar
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Brijlal Bedia And Others vs The Deputy Commissioner on 25 February, 2025

Author: Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench: Anubha Rawat Choudhary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                F. A. No. 82 of 2017

 Brijlal Bedia and Others              ...   ...    Appellants
                       Versus
 The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                     ...   ...      Respondents
                       With
                F. A. No. 84 of 2017

 Chamara Bedia and Others            ...     ...    Appellants
                     Versus
 The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                   ...    ...       Respondents
                     With
              F. A. No. 85 of 2017

 Dhanpatiya                            ...   ...    Appellant
                     Versus
 The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                   ...    ...       Respondents
                     With
              F. A. No. 86 of 2017

 Rengtu Bedia                          ...   ...    Appellant
                    Versus
 The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Others
                                ...        ...      Respondents

                       With
                F. A. No. 87 of 2017

 Dahawa Bedia and Another            ...     ...    Appellants
                     Versus
 The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                   ...    ...       Respondents
                     With
              F. A. No. 93 of 2017

 Mangra Munda and Others             ...     ...    Appellants
                     Versus
 The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                   ...    ...       Respondents
                     With
              F. A. No. 94 of 2017

 Nito Bedia                            ...   ...    Appellant
                       Versus



                         1
          The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                           ...    ...                       Respondents
                             With
                      F. A. No. 96 of 2017

         Sohna Bedia and Others              ...     ...                     Appellants
                             Versus
         The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                           ...    ...                       Respondents
                             With
                      F. A. No. 99 of 2017

         Mangra Munda and Others             ...     ...                     Appellants
                            Versus
         The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                        ...       ...                       Respondents

                             With
                      F. A. No. 101 of 2017

         Kameshwar Munda and Another         ...     ...                     Appellants
                            Versus
         The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh and Another
                                        ...       ...                       Respondents


                       ---

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Appellants : Mr. Mitul Kumar, Advocate For the U.O.I. : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate [In F.A. 85 of 2017, F.A. No. 86 of 2017, F.A. No. 93 of 2017 and F.A. No. 94 of 2017] For the Respondents : Ms. Nitu Sinha, CGC [In F.A. 82 of 2017, F.A No. 84 of 2017 and F.A. 96 of 2017]

---

10/25.02.2025 F.A. No. 82 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1475 of 2022, F.A. No. 84 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1489 of 2022, F.A. No. 85 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1479 of 2022, F.A. No. 86 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1485 of 2022, F.A. No. 87 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1473 of 2022, F.A. No. 93 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1484 of 2022, F.A. No. 94 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1486 of 2022, F.A. No. 96 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1487 of 2022, F.A. No. 99 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1474 of 2022 and F.A. No. 101 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1480 of 2022.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. The interlocutory applications has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1354 days (In all appeals).

3. The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings and the reason for condonation of delay is that the appellants are extremely poor persons and they were not able to arrange money.The learned counsel for the appellants has also submitted that for the similarly situated adjoining villages arising out of the same date of acquisition different rate of compensation has been fixed which is higher amount and the villagers are tribal and are poor persons. He submits that the villagers are entitled for adequate compensation as per the provisions of law and therefore, the delay be condoned.

4. No counter affidavit has been filed to the aforesaid interlocutory applications for condonation of delay. However, the learned counsel for the respondents have opposed the prayer and have submitted that the other cases which the appellants are referring have already been taken care of in the impugned judgment and they have submitted that adequate compensation has already been given to the appellants as per provision of law.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in the petition for condonation of delay and being satisfied with the cause shown by the appellants, delay in filing the appeals is condoned. The interlocutory applications I.A. No. 1475 of 2022, I.A. No. 1489 of 2022, I.A. No. 1479 of 2022, I.A. No. 1485 of 2022, I.A. No. 1473 of 2022, I.A. No. 1484 of 2022, I.A. No. 1486 of 2022, I.A. No. 1487 of 2022, I.A. No. 1474 of 2022 and I.A. No. 1480 of 2022 are hereby allowed.

6. At this, the learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that let these appeals be admitted.

7. Admit

8. Let the records be called for from the concerned court. It appears that only one set of records would suffice.

9. Post these cases on 24th March, 2025 for final disposal.

10. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Rakesh/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter