Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hasib Ahmad Usmani vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 7617 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7617 Jhar
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Hasib Ahmad Usmani vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... ... on 12 December, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen
Bench: Ananda Sen
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                     Cont. Case (Civil) No.85 of 2025
                                   ------
    Hasib Ahmad Usmani.                                ... ... Petitioner
                                  Versus
    The State of Jharkhand & Ors.              ... ... Opposite Parties
                                   ------
                      CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

------

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the O.P. (s) : Mr. Anish Kumar Mishra, AC to Sr.SC-I AC to AAG

-----

06/ 12.12.2025

By filing this Contempt Petition, the petitioner has

brought to the notice of this Court that the order dated 03.07.2024

(final order) passed in W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021, has not yet been

complied with.

2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits

that W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021 (Hasib Ahmad Usmani Vs. The

State of Jharkhand & Ors.) was disposed by a Coordinate Bench

of this Court, with a direction to the opposite parties to verify the

factual aspects and the issues involved in that writ petition vis. a

vis. the factual aspects and the issues involved in W.P.(S) No.1386

of 2009 (Miss. Ursula Tirkey & Ors. Vs. The State of

Jharkhand & Ors.) and other Analogous cases. It was further

ordered that if the facts and issues involved in both the cases are

similar, the benefits which have been granted to the petitioners in

W.P.(S) No.1386 of 2009, should also be granted to that petitioner

of W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021. He further submits that the order

passed in W.P.(S) No.1386 of 2009 and other analogous cases, was

challenged in L.P.A. No.13 of 2024 (The State of Jharkhand &

Ors. Vs. Miss. Ursula Tirkey & Ors.) and other Analogous

cases. The said Letters Patent Appeal along with other Analogous

Appeals were heard and dismissed vide judgment dated

22.04.2024. It is his contention that after the aforesaid L.P.A.

No.13 of 2024 was dismissed, the respondents have challenged

the order passed in W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021 in L.P.A. No.590 of

2025 (The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Hasib Ahmad

Usmani & Ors.).

3. The aforesaid facts have been admitted by the opposite

parties. The aforesaid facts further clearly suggest that the State

has framed the Litigation Policy only for the sake of drafting a Policy

and their intention is not to implement the same.

4. This Court fails to understand that when the set of

Letters Patent Appeals has already been dismissed, then what was

the necessity to file another Letters Patent Appeal against the order

passed in W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021, that too after dismissal of the

earlier Letters Patent Appeal.

5. Be it noted that in W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021, the order

was passed only to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of

order passed in W.P.(S) No.1386 of 2009 and other Analogous

cases, and to give benefit to that petitioner, similar to those

petitioners in W.P.(S) No.1386 of 2009 and other Analogous cases.

Be it noted that in the writ petition being W.P.(S) No.4790 of 2021,

the issues were not decided, rather the issue which was supposed

to be followed was decided in W.P.(S) No.1386 of 2009, which stood

affirmed in L.P.A. No.13 of 2024 and other Analogous cases.

6. When the State frames a Litigation Policy, it is expected

that the State should follow the same.

7. This Court fails to understand that in spite of the

Litigation Policy, how the Letters Patent Appeal being L.P.A. No.590

of 2025, has been filed, that too, after disposal of L.P.A. No.13 of

2024 and other analogous cases vide judgment dated 22.04.2024.

8. Thus, this Court wants to peruse the file and identify

the persons, who have initiated the process of filing the Letters

Patent Appeal being L.P.A. No.590 of 2025.

9. The Director - Secondary Education, Government of

Jharkhand, the Secretary - School Education & Literacy Department,

Government of Jharkhand, the Law Secretary, Government of

Jharkhand, should remain present in person before this Court on

16th December, 2025 at 10:30 A.M., along with the entire file.

10. List this case on 16.12.2025 at 10:30 A.M., as the first

case.

11. Let a copy of this order be immediately faxed to the

Director - Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, the

Secretary - School Education & Literacy Department, Government

of Jharkhand, the Law Secretary, Government of Jharkhand.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

12th December, 2025 Prashant. Cp-2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter