Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Stp Limited vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary
2024 Latest Caselaw 9629 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9629 Jhar
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Stp Limited vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary on 25 September, 2024

Author: Rajesh Kumar

Bench: Rajesh Kumar

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        (Civil Writ Jurisdiction)
                        W.P. (C) No.7340 of 2012
                                    ----

STP Limited, a registered company under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Jamshedpur, having its registered office at Turner Morrison Building, 1st Floor, 6, Lyons Range, P.O.and P.S.: Hare Street, Kolkata and its factory at village:

Mirzadih, Patamda, through Sri. K.K.Biyani, S/oLate BC BIYANI, Director, Resident of 15C Anil Roy Road, Kolkata 700029.

                                                ....     ....     Petitioner(s)
                                  Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi.

2. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Environments & Forest, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.

3. The Forest Range Officer, Dalma Range, Dalma wild Life Sanctuary Jamshedpur. .... .... Respondent(s)

----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

----

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhijit Kr. Singh, C.G.C.

----

th 10/Dated: 25 September, 2024

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:-

"(1) For the issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction / directions or a writ in the Nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 10.10.2012 (Annexure-6) issued by the Forest Range Officer, Dalma Range, Dalma Wild Life Sanctuary, Jamshedpur vide which Order the Respondent No.: 3 has directed the Petitioner to shut down its factory in an illegal and arbitrary manner AND/OR

(ii) For the issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction / directions directing that during the pendency of the instant writ application, the respondents be prevented from taking any coercive action on the basis of the order dated 10.10.12

(iii) For the issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction / directions directing that during the pendency of the instant writ application, the respondents be restrained to implement the notification dated the, 29, March 2012 and order dated 10th October 2012 in relation to petitioner's factory at Dimna Road, Mirzadih, Jamshedpur 831018.

AND/OR

(iv) For issuance of such other writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may think just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case doing conscionable justice to the petitioners."

3. Thus, the issue involved in the present writ petition is the effect of the notification dated 29.03.2012.

4. It appears that there was series of litigation and various writ petitions have been filed before this Court in batch of cases i.e. W.P. (C) No.2761 of 2014 with analogous cases. The issue has been settled that it will apply on the existing unit also and accordingly the writ petitions have been dismissed vide order dated 16.09.2014.

5. It further appears that against the order of the said writ court, Letters Patent Appeal has been filed which has been heard together being L.P.A. No.391 of 2014 and analogous cases and the same have been disposed of vide order dated 16.11.2016. Paragraph No.18 of the said LPA is relevant which is quoted hereinbelow:-

"In view of the aforesaid discussions, we are of the considered view that since the cases of the appellants were required to be decided by the National Green Tribunal, the appellants be given the liberty to move the National Green Tribunal for adjudication of their cases afresh. If the appellants move the National Green Tribunal, the impugned judgment dated 16.9.2014 passed in W.P. (C) No. 2761 of 2014 and analogous cases, shall not come in the way of the National Green Tribunal in giving its independent decision in the matters. Upon adjudication of the matters by the National Green Tribunal, if made, the decision of the National Green Tribunal shall prevail."

6. Thus, the LPA Court has held that the High Court has no jurisdiction rather the jurisdiction lies with the National Green Tribunal. Accordingly, liberty has been given to the parties to approach the National Green Tribunal.

7. Since the issue has been settled that appropriate remedy lies before the National Green Tribunal, accordingly the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the National Green Tribunal.

8. An interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 08.07.2013 which is continued till date, is extended for further eight weeks from today.

9. The parties are at liberty to work out their remedy in accordance with law.

10. Pending I.A., if any, also stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

Amar/-

Uploaded




Page | 2                                                                            W.P. (C) No.7340 of 2012
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter