Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 96 Jhar
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(T) No. 5315 of 2021
---
M/s Dhansar Engineering Co. Private Limited ---Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Of Commercial Taxes, Ranchi
2. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ranchi
3. Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Administration), Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad
4. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Dhanbad Circle, Dhanbad
5. Commercial Taxes Officer, Intelligence Bureau, Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad
6. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Intelligence Bureau, Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad
7. Pawan Kumar Kedia, State Tax Officer, Dhanbad--- ....Respondents
----
CORAM: Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjeet Kushwaha, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, Sr. S.C.-I Mr. Rituraj, A.C to Sr. S.C.-I For the Resp. no. 7 : Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate
----
15/04.01.2023 Show-cause has been filed by respondent no. 7 on 20th December, 2022 in view of the order dated 6th December, 2022. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 7 Mr. Suraj Prakash has sought to draw attention of the Court to the explanation furnished in the show-cause.
Learned counsel for the State, Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr. S.C.- I submits that on the main grievance of refund claimed by the petitioner, the issue has been discussed with the officials of the department after examining the relevant records. As the situation emerges now, the Excess Demand Notice has been issued on 28th September, 2022 (Annexure-A to the supplementary counter affidavit) filed by the respondent no 3 on 9th November, 2022, which is to the tune of Rs. 15,36,120.00. Since the amount of penalty, which was imposed by learned Tribunal was deposited by the petitioner dealer, the Department is ready to refund the said amount to the petitioner on his approaching. He prays that some time may be granted for that purpose.
The grievance of the petitioner as encapsulated in the orders passed earlier by this Court is in relation to claim of refund along with statutory interest on account of quashing of the order of penalty by learned Commercial Taxes Tribunal vide judgment dated 23rd September, 2011.
Having regard to the submission made by learned counsel for the State, we deem it proper to adjourn the matter for three weeks for the department to process and refund the amount due under the Excess Demand Notice in favour of the petitioner. Petitioner shall approach the competent authority/respondent no. 3-J.C.C.T Administration, in the meantime, for undertaking the necessary formalities.
Matter be listed on 1st February, 2023.
Respondent no. 7, Mr. Pawan Kedia, State Tax Officer, Dhanbad shall remain present on the next date.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, A.C.J)
(Deepak Roshan, J) jk/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!