Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 723 Jhar
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(S) No. 4481 of 2019
------
1. Ranjit Yadav
2. Mandip Kumar
3. Md. Belal Mansuri
4. Sanjay Choudhary
5. Kuldip Kumar Mahto
6. Sanjay Kumar
7. Md. Yaqoob Alam
8. Surya Deo Singh
9. Gorakh Nath Singh
10. Anand Kumar Ravi
11. Priya Ranjan Yadav
12. Sushil Kumar Prajapati
13. Ashok Kumar Gupta
14. Dinesh Kumar Gupta
15. Umesh Chaudhary
16. Arun Kumar Singh
17. Vijay Kumar Thakur
18. Anuj Kumar Kushwaha
19. Jahendra Prasad Gupta
20. Binod Kumar Yadav
21. Gaya Singh
22. Gupta Ram
23. Shamim Ahmad
24. Fekan Ram
25. Mritunjay Kumar Pandey
26. Sanyogita Kumari
27. Anil Kumar Kashyap
28. Sheonarayan Sah
29. Surendra Kumar Ram
30. Surendra Kumar Ravi
31. Pradeep Kumar Ravi
32. Amar Ram
33. Om Prakash
34. Tarik Anwar Ansari
35. Rajendra Prajapati .... .... Petitioner(s).
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
3. Principal Secretary, Depart. of Personnel, Raj Bhasa & Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Ranchi
4. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Depart. Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa
5. Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Depart. Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Ranchi
6. Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council, JSCA Stadium Road Sector-3, Dhurwa Old HEC High School, Ranchi
7. Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa
8. Deputy Superintendent Education, Garhwa
9. Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro
10. District Superintendent Education, Bokaro
11. Union of India through Secretary, Human Resources Development Depart. Govt. of India, New Delhi .... .... Respondent(s)
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.
------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For JEPC : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For State : Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA-II
05/10.02.2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The issue of regularisation of para teachers has been set at rest by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No.315 of 2016 and analogous cases vide judgment dated 16.12.2022. It has been held that the para teachers cannot be regularized.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioners, who are para teachers, are claiming for regularisation. The issue is thus, covered by the judgment dated 16.12.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No.315 of 2016.
4. Considering the aforesaid fact, this writ petition is also dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 16.12.2022 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No.315 of 2016 and analogous cases.
(ANANDA SEN , J) anjali/cp2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!