Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilchand Kumar Sharma @ Karu ... vs The State Of Jharkhand
2022 Latest Caselaw 4818 Jhar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4818 Jhar
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2022

Jharkhand High Court
Dilchand Kumar Sharma @ Karu ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 1 December, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                         Cr. Revision No. 1246 of 2022
                                    ....

Dilchand Kumar Sharma @ Karu Thakur @ Dilchand Sharma ...... Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Gopal Sao ...... Opp. Parties

-----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

-----

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A. P. P. For the O. P. No.2 : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate .....

04/01.12.2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, during course of the day.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

3. The instant I.A. No. 10996 of 2022 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 60 days in filing the instant Criminal Revision No. 1246 of 2022.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is delay of 60 days in filing Criminal Revision No. 1246 of 2022. It is submitted that the case has been compromised between the parties and the petitioner has paid a sum of (Rupees Four Lakh) Rs. 4,00,000/- in cash to the opposite party no. 2 and as such, delay of 60 days in preferring the instant Criminal Revision Application may be condoned.

5. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection.

6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has admitted the factum of compromise and has submitted that the opposite party no. 2 has received Rs. 4,00,000/- in cash from the petitioner.

7. Having considered the submission of the learned counsel

for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and taking lenient view, the delay of 60 days in preferring the Criminal Revision No. 1246 of 2022 is, hereby, condoned.

8. I.A. No. 10996 of 2022 is allowed and stands disposed of.

Cr. Revision No. 1246 of 2022

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to mention the date of custody of the petitioner in the Criminal Revision No. 1246 of 2022 during course of the day.

10. The present Criminal Revision No. 1246 of 2022 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 24.05.2022 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 2020 by the learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribag whereby learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribag has dismissed the Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 2020 on account of non-depositing of 20% of the amount of compensation and also challenged the judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 23.01.2020 passed by Sri Mayank Maliyaz, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Complaint Case No. 1666 of 2019 corresponding to T. R. No. 24 of 2020 whereby the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act and has been sentenced to undergo S. I. for a period of six (6) months and to pay the compensation amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- for the offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act to the complainant under Section 357 (3) of the Cr. P. C.

11. I.A. No. 10730 of 2022 has been filed on behalf of both the sides i.e. the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 by way of compromise petition.

12. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2

13. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case has been compromised between the parties and the petitioner has paid a sum of (Rupees Four Lakh) Rs. 4,00,000/- in cash to the opposite party no. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2022 and as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

14. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection.

15. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has admitted the factum of compromise and has submitted that the opposite party no. 2 has received Rs. 4,00,000/- in cash from the petitioner.

16. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the case has been compromised between both the sides also considering the custody of the petitioner i.e. the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2, during pendency of this Criminal Revision Application, the petitioner namely Dilchand Kumar Sharma @ Karu Thakur @ Dilchand Sharma is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Mayank Maliyaz, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag or his Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1666 of 2019 corresponding to T. R. No. 24 of 2020.

17. Put up this case on 20.12.2022 under the heading "For Admission".

(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Kamlesh/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter