Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager vs Anandi Prasad Choudhary & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 3977 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3977 Jhar
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
The Branch Manager vs Anandi Prasad Choudhary & Ors on 25 October, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                  M.A. No. 331 of 2018
        The Branch Manager, United Indian Insurance
        Company, Ranchi............                       Appellants
                                  Versus
        Anandi Prasad Choudhary & Ors............               Respondents
                                  ......

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen ......

For the Appellants : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Nityanand Pd. Choudhary, Advocate : Mr. D.C.Ghosh, Advocate ......

I.A. No. 4840 of 2018

11/25.10.2021 This interlocutory application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 110 days, occurred in filing this appeal.

Counsel for the appellant submits that after the award was passed, the certified copy of the impugned judgment and award was sent to the office of the appellant. An opinion was sought for from the counsel whether to file appeal or not. Once the opinion was obtained, the same was provided to the Chief Regional Manager, Ranchi and, thereafter, all the documents were obtained and the counsel in the High Court was contacted and thereafter, the appeal was drafted and filed. He submits that these processes consumed sometime resulting in delay of 110 days in filing this appeal. He submits that since substantial points have been raised in this appeal, the delay may be condoned.

Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents does not have any objection in condoning the delay of 110 days.

Considering the statements made in the interlocutory application, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and also taking into consideration the delay, which has been caused because of the procedure, which had to be followed in the office of the appellant, this Court is of the opinion that the reasons have sufficiently been explained by the appellant for condoning the delay of 110 days, occurred in filing this appeal. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed. The delay of 110 days, occurred in filing this appeal is hereby condoned.

I.A. No. 4840 of 2018 stands disposed of.

I.A. No. 4294 of 2021 This interlocutory application has been filed under Order 22 Rule 10 A of C.P.C. by the respondent-claimant informing that Respondent No. 1 Anandi Prasad Choudhary has died on 05.12.2018. It has been mentioned in Para-3 that the deceased has left behind his widow

Godawari Choudhary and his son Parveen Kumar Choudhary as his legal heirs.

By way of information, this fact has been brought to the notice of this Court. A copy of this interlocutory application has also been served upon the counsel appearing for the appellant.

The fact, mentioned in this petition, has been noted. I.A. No. 4294 of 2021 stands disposed of.

M.A. No. 331 of 2018 List this appeal after two weeks as Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he will file some application supplementing the substitution application.

(Ananda Sen, J) Mukund/-cp.2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter