Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shambhu Kumar @ Sambhu Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 3798 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3798 Jhar
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Shambhu Kumar @ Sambhu Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 5 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
              A.B.A. No. 7455 of 2021
                          ------
      Shambhu Kumar @ Sambhu Kumar                  ...            Petitioner
                             Versus
      The State of Jharkhand       ...                         Opposite Party
                              ------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradipto Mitra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P.

------

Order No.02 Dated- 05.10.2021

Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.204 of 2020 registered under sections 504/506/323/387/ 420/406/452/448/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in love with the daughter of the informant before marriage of her daughter and later on a divorce petition was filed by the husband of the daughter of the informant on the ground of her friendship with the petitioner and relied upon the filthy messages purportedly sent by the petitioner to the daughter of the informant; which messages suggest that even after the marriage of the daughter of the informant, the petitioner tried to contact her and wanted to meet her and also the petitioner threatened the informant that if Rs.5,00,000/- was not paid then he would make the photographs of the daughter of the informant viral. It is further submitted that being annoyed with the fact that her daughter is in love with the petitioner, the informant without explaining the delay belatedly foisted this false complaint, which upon being referred to police under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., the FIR of this case has been registered. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no averment in the complaint that the complainant ever approached the police; which creates a reasonable doubt about the case of the prosecution as has been observed in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Priyanka Srivastava & Anr. vs. State of U.P. & Ors. reported in (2015) 6 SCC 287. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes that he will annoy or disturb the informant or her daughter in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamshedpur, in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.204 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that the petitioner will annoy or disturb the informant or her daughter in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter