Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Doman Hansda @ Sagen Manjhi vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 2826 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2826 Jhar
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Doman Hansda @ Sagen Manjhi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 10 August, 2021
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 310 of 2020

             Doman Hansda @ Sagen Manjhi                   ---   ---    Appellant
                                              Versus
             The State of Jharkhand                        ---   ---    Respondent
                                                 ---

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary Through: Video Conferencing

---

For the Appellant: Mr. Amresh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P

---

07 / 10.08.2021 Heard learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Amresh Kumar and learned A.P.P Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava on the prayer for condonation of delay of 114 days in preferring the instant Memo of Appeal made through I.A. No. 3724/2021.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant being poor, could not prefer appeal within time and thereafter approached the High Court Legal Services Committee for legal aid. Thereafter, appeal was filed. Delay may be condoned, otherwise he may suffer irreparably.

3. Learned A.P.P does not oppose.

4. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on being satisfied with the reasons explained, delay is condoned. I.A. No. 3724/2021 stands disposed of.

5. The sole appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable under sections 353, 333, 307 and 414 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 27 read with section 35 of the Arms Act by the impugned judgment dated 23.09.2019 passed in Sessions Trial No. 156/2017 by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Ghatsila and has been sentenced to undergo R.I for two years with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- under section 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code; R.I for seven years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- under section 333/34 of the Indian Penal Code; R.I for ten years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- under section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and R.I for two years under section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been further sentenced to undergo R.I for two years with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- under section 25(1-B), A of the Arms Act and R.I for five years with a fine of Rs. 3,000/- under section 26 and 27 of the Arms Act and default sentences by the impugned order of sentence dated 24.09.2019.

6. Admit.

7. Call for the lower court records in connection with Sessions Trial No. 156/2017 from the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Ghatsila.

8. The prayer for suspension of sentence made through I.A. No. 3386/2021 shall be considered after receipt of the lower court records.

9. Learned A.P.P shall make an inquiry as to the status of investigation / trial against two other accused persons namely Chunu Pandaya @ Dole Pandaya and Madhav Lohar who were also charge sheeted along with the present appellant. Let such an affidavit be filed with four weeks.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J) Ranjeet/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter