Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Principal Secretary vs Dr. Jyotish Chandra Singh & Others
2021 Latest Caselaw 1802 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1802 Jhar
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
The Principal Secretary vs Dr. Jyotish Chandra Singh & Others on 17 April, 2021
                                   -1-


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                   L.P.A. No.496 of 2019
                             ----

The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand ... ... Appellant Versus Dr. Jyotish Chandra Singh & Others ... ... Respondents

-------

CORAM :          HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
                              ------
For the Appellant      : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Sr. S.C.-I
For the Respondents    : Mr. Shray Mishra, Advocate
                             --------
ORAL JUDGMENT

Order No. 11 : Dated 17th April, 2021

With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been

done through video conferencing and there is no complaint

whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

The instant appeal has been preferred by the State of

Jharkhand against the order passed by learned Single Judge in

W.P.(S) No. 4071 of 2017 dated 08.08.2018 whereby and whereunder

the age of superannuation of the writ petitioner who is working in

AYUSH has been directed to be enhanced to 65 years.

We have passed an order on 19.03.2021 whereby and

whereunder after considering the decision of Cabinet about

enhancement of age of superannuation up to the age of 65 years, put

query upon the learned counsel for the appellant State that when the

Cabinet has taken a decision for enhancement of the age of

retirement, without any stipulation making the decision subject to

outcome of appeal, then under what authority the said decision has

been made subject to the result of the appeal whereas in the

resolution of the Health Department it stands reflected. Therefore,

we had directed to file an affidavit answering the issue.

The matter has been adjourned on the request made on behalf

of the learned counsel appearing for the State on several occasions.

On 26.03.2021 while allowing time, a cost of Rs.5,000/- for

wasting the Court's time has been directed to be paid. It has been

informed to this Court that the cost in pursuance to the direction

dated 26.03.2021 has been paid and affidavit has also been filed.

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, learned Sr. S.C.-I, appearing for the

appellant State has submitted by referring to the aforesaid affidavit

dated 17.04.2021 that the Department of Personnel had given their

opinion that the decision of the Cabinet contained in the resolution

dated 08.01.2021 shall be subject to the order to be passed in L.P.A.

No. 496 of 2019. Such stipulation has been made in the aforesaid

resolution dated 08.01.2021 on the basis of decision taken by the

Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department,

Government of Jharkhand by placing the record before the Cabinet

to insert the aforesaid condition in Cabinet decision.

We have considered the aforesaid stand of the appellant State of

Jharkhand as contained in affidavit dated 17.04.2021 but we are not

satisfied with such contention for the reason that as per the rules of

executive business, once a decision has been taken by the Cabinet,

whether the concerned department has got no authority to first add

something in the resolution and then place the file once again before

the Cabinet for inserting a condition which was available in the file

but the Cabinet has not considered it appropriate to insert the same

in its decision. Hence, the explanation furnished in the affidavit

having not found to be satisfactory, as such we hereby reject the

affidavit.

The appellant State is directed to file fresh affidavit referring

therein the jurisdiction of the concerned department that once before

approval of a decision by the Cabinet if any stipulation has been

made in the file by the concerned department and if it has not been

approved by the Cabinet, can the concerned department insert it and come up

with a notification/resolution showing it to be a decision of Cabinet

and then again send it before the Cabinet to insert the same.

If the concerned department is having such jurisdiction,

appellant State is directed to apprise this Court about such provision

of law either from the statute or from the rules of executive business

applicable for the State of Jharkhand.

Let this matter be listed on 04.05.2021.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.)

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Birendra/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter