Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

2026:Jklhc-Jmu:382 vs U.T. Of J&K And Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 791 J&K

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 791 J&K
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

2026:Jklhc-Jmu:382 vs U.T. Of J&K And Ors on 16 February, 2026

Author: Sanjay Dhar
Bench: Sanjay Dhar
                                                                        2026:JKLHC-JMU:382


                                                                   Sr. No. 132
       HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                       AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 328/2026

Anshi Sharma and Anr.                           ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)


                     Through :- Mr. Shafiq Ahmed Wani, Advocate

                Vs

U.T. of J&K and Ors.                                        .....Respondent(s)


                Through :- Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
                                  ORDER

16.02.2026

01. In the instant petition, the petitioners seek a direction

upon respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to provide them the police

protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from

respondent Nos. 4 to 6. It is submitted that the petitioners

are major and have married out of their own free will. Copy

of Marriage Certificate dated 06.02.2026 and proof of

petitioners' date of birth have been placed on record. They

submit that since they have contracted the marriage

against the wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, as such, they

are facing harassment at their hands.

02. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of

the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P and anr,

2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in the absence of there

being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to

marry according to their choice and the official respondents

2026:JKLHC-JMU:382

are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the

petitioners.

03. I have heard the counsel for the parties and perused the

record on the file.

04. Perusal of the documents annexed with the writ petition,

prima facie, reveals that the petitioners are major and they

have contracted the marriage according to Hindu Rites and

Rituals. Any person having attained the age of majority is

entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and

the police is duty bound to protect the life and liberty of

such persons, if approached by the concerned parties.

However, it appears that the petitioners have not

approached the official respondents for their indulgence in

the matter for providing protection to them.

05. Keeping in view the relief sought for, this petition is

disposed of, at this stage itself, by providing that

respondent Nos. 1 to 3 shall look into the grievance of the

petitioners for providing them adequate security and to

ensure that nobody interferes in married life of the

petitioners, if the petitioners approach them. It is made

clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the

validity of their marriage, and the police is free to take a

view on the basis of the available material and inquiry. If it

is found that the parties are major and have married out of

2026:JKLHC-JMU:382

their own free will and consent, the necessary protection

shall be extended to them.

06. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.

(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 16.02.2026 Mihul

Whether the order is speaking : Yes Whether the order is reportable : No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter