Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1099 J&K/2
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2025
89
supp
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
RSA No. 7/2025
CM No. 3096/2025
Mohan Lal Sehgal and Ors.
..... Appellant (s)
Through: Mr. Nisar Hussain Shah, Sr. Adv.
with Ms. Saima Ghulam, Adv.
V/s
Mohammad Sadeeq
..... Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. A M Khan, Adv.
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge
ORDER
21.05.2025
The appellants, through the medium of present appeal, have challenged
judgment and decree dated 24.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional
District Judge, Baramulla whereby suit for permanent prohibitory injunction
filed by the appellants against the respondent/defendant has been dismissed
and the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court on 29.12.2018,
has been set aside.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record of the
case. From a perusal of the same, the following questions of law emerge for
determination of this Court;
Page |2
i) Whether finding of the learned trial court that the plaintiffs are
not in possession of the suit land is perverse and as such, liable
to be set side?
ii) Whether in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by
a joint owner of the suit property against a 3rd party, without
impleading the other co-sharers as party to the suit is
maintainable?
The appeal is admitted to hearing.
Issue post admission notice to the respondent.
Mr. A M Khan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
In the meantime, status quo with regard to the possession of the suit land
shall be maintained by the parties.
List on 14.07.2025.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
SRINAGAR 21.05.2025 Aasif
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!