Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mushtaq Hussain vs Member J&K Special Tribunal
2025 Latest Caselaw 686 J&K

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 686 J&K
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2025

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Mushtaq Hussain vs Member J&K Special Tribunal on 5 August, 2025

Author: Rajnesh Oswal
Bench: Rajnesh Oswal
                                                                Sr. No.3
         HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                         AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: LPA No. 09/2024
Mushtaq Hussain                                     ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
S/o Lt. Sh. Mohd. Shafi
R/o Mohalla Baba Jeevan Shah, Jammu

                   Through: Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate.

                                  V/s

1.    Member J&K Special Tribunal,                            .... Respondent(s)
Jammu.
2.    Commissioner, Jammu Municipal
Corporation, Town Hall, Jammu.
3.    Joint     Commissioner,    Jammu
Municipal Corporation, Town Hall,
Jammu.
4.    Khilafwarzi      Officer,  Jammu
Municipal Corporation, Town Hall,
Jammu.
5. Dr Javed Chowdhary,
S/o Late Sh. Fateh AIi Chowdhary
R/o Residency Road, Jammu.

                      Through: Mr. S S Nanda, Sr. AAG for respondent nos. 2
                               to 4.
                               Mr. N A Chowdhary, Advocate for respondent
                               no.5.


CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.

                                   ORDER

05.08.2025 (ORAL)

1. This is an intra court appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against an

order and judgment dated November 24, 2023, vide which the petition preferred

by respondent No. 5 (Dr. Javed Chowdhary) was disposed of with a direction to

the J&K Special Tribunal (for short the 'Tribunal') to decide the pending appeal

preferred by the appellant (Mushtaq Hussain) within a period of three months.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that notice under Section 7(1) of

the Jammu and Kashmir Control of Building Operations Act, 1988, (the

'Act'), the appellant was allegedly served with as also the order under Section

7(3) of the Act, passed by the Commissioner, Jammu Municipal Corporation,

Jammu, was with respect to;

(a) the alleged construction of a room on first floor without

permission of Jammu Municipal Corporation;

(b) for not having observed the required set back;

(c) the said illegal construction raised seriously affects the planned

development of Jammu City and contravenes the zoning regulation.

However, he submits, that the learned Single Judge, in addition to the

above, observed in Paragraph No.4 of the impugned order that the Tribunal shall

also determine if while carrying out the alleged unauthorized construction, any

portion of public lane was also encroached upon:

'in addition the Jammu & Kashmir Special Tribunal shall also deal

with the aspect about the fact that whether in the course of alleged

unauthorized construction any portion of public lane has been

encroached upon both land wise or aerial wise and accordingly to

dispose of the matter on merits.'

3. Accordingly, it is urged, for, the appellant was neither put to any notice as

regards any alleged encroachment upon any portion of a public lane nor that was

the subject matter of the order passed by the competent authority under Section

7(3) of the Act, the observations recorded by the learned Single Judge are

apparently erroneous/unsustainable.

4. Upon being pointedly asked as to whether the issue as regards

unauthorized construction upon a portion of a public lane was a subject matter of

the notice under Section 7 (1) of the Act, learned counsel for the respondents

expresses his inability to respond thereto.

5. However, learned counsel for the Jammu Municipal Corporation fairly

submits that the notice, the appellant was allegedly served with under Section

7(1) of the Act as also the order passed under Section 7(3) of the

Act, did not refer to any such unauthorized construction on any public lane/street.

However, if so advised, the Corporation would take necessary measures even in

this regard in accordance with the law.

6. In the wake of above and in terms of the statement made by the learned

counsel for the parties, the impugned order and judgment is modified to the

extent that the Tribunal shall proceed to decide the appeal preferred by the

appellant only as regards the alleged unauthorized construction /deviation

/violation that were the subject matter of the notice under Section 7(1) of the Act

and qua which the order under provisions of Section 7 (3) of the Act was

subsequently passed.

7. Disposed of.

                                             (RAJNESH OSWAL)              (ARUN PALLI)
                                                      JUDGE              CHIEF JUSTICE
           Jammu
           05.08.2025
           Sunita/PS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter