Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 70 j&K
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2022
S.No.65
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
(through virtual mode)
CPSW No.353/2018
Narinder Singh ...Petitioner(s)
Through: None
V/s
Vikas Sharma and another ...Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for initiation of contempt
proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience and non-
compliance of the judgment dated 17.04.2017 passed in SWP No.2322/2015,
whereby a direction has been issued to the respondents to consider the claim of
the petitioner having regard to the judgment of the Apex Court strictly in
accordance with the policy, provided the same is applicable to the case of the
petitioner.
On being put on notice, the respondents have caused appearance through
their counsel, Mr. Adarsh Sharma and have also filed compliance report. Along
with compliance report, the respondents have placed on record consideration
order bearing No.JDA/Estt/489-90 dated 23.07.2019 passed by the Vice
Chairman, Jammu Development Authority, Jammu, a perusal whereof
indicates that the claim of the petitioner has been considered in compliance to
the direction of this Court and the same has been rejected on the ground that
there are no approved rules on the basis of which the petitioner could be
granted promotion.
In view of the compliance report filed by the respondents and the
consideration order placed on record, there remains nothing to proceed further
in the matter. Accordingly, proceedings in this contempt petition are closed.
(Sanjeev Kumar) Judge JAMMU:
02.02.2022 Vinod, Pvt. Secy.
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!