Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16013 HP
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.4131 of 2021 and connected matters.
Decided on: 29th October, 2024 _________________________________________________________________
1. CWP No. 4131 of 2021 Narender Pal and others ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
2. CWP No. 4005 of 2021 Sanjay Sharma and others ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
3. CWP No. 4121 of 2021
Hardeep Kaur and others ....Petitioners
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Jeet Kumar and others ....Petitioners
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Manorma Singh ...Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Bhagi Rath ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Manju Bala ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Manjusha ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Surender Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Lalita Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Sunita Kumari Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Sudarshan Gautam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Kusam Kumari ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Shashi Anand ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Reena Banga ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Saroj Thakur ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Kusum Lata ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Poonam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Chander Kiran ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Panna Lal ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Murari Lal Sharma and others ....Petitioners
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ranjeet Singh ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Sanjay Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Virender Thakur ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Sunil Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Rakesh Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Kamal Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Murli Chand ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Navneet Thakur ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Shashi Bala ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Jeewna Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ghanshyam Thakur ...Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Rakesh Gupta ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Arvind Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ajay Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Vikas ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Minu Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Sulochna Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Klip Singh and others ....Petitioners
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ravi Kant ....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Heard.
2. These writ petitions have been filed for grant of
following common substantive relief: -
"(i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the Respondents to count the services rendered by the Petitioners on contract basis prior to their regularization as qualifying service for the purpose of pension under CCS Pension Rules, 1972 and for the purpose of annual increments, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the issue raised in these writ petitions has already been
adjudicated in Budhi Singh & Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No. 10911 of 2024, decided on 21.10.2024.
4. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India without even preferring any
representation(s) to the competent authority for the redressal
of their grievances raised in these writ petitions.
5. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the
petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring
representation(s) within three weeks from today. In case such
a representation(s) is/are so made, the same shall be decided
by the competent authority in accordance with law within a
period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also
be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above
terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if
any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge October 29, 2024 R.Atal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!