Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17300 HP
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Revision No.371 of 2024
Date of Decision : 13.11.2024
State of Himachal Pradesh
...... Petitioner
Versus
Pardeep Kumar @ Dippu .......Respondent
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General.
For the respondent : Nemo.
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed laying challenge to
impugned order dated 19.01.2024, passed by learned Sessions Judge,
Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., in Session Trial No.10-7/23, titled State vs.
Pardeep Kumar etc.
2. The specific grievance of the petitioner/State is with respect to
dropping of charges under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribe Act vide the impugned order. In terms of order dated 08.08.2024, in
the present proceedings, police report filed under Section 173 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, has been placed on record.
3. I have perused the police report and heard learned Additional
Advocate General on behalf of the petitioner/State.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
4. From perusal of the police report, it is evident that there is no
infirmity in the impugned order dated 19.01.2024, passed by learned
Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., in Session Trial No.10-7/23,
titled State vs. Pardeep Kumar etc.
5. In view of above, present petition is dismissed. Pending
miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( Bipin Chander Negi)
November 13, 2024 (KS) Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!